The Liberty Tree Lantern

Dear Matt,

 It appears that there is a legal defense against a forced vaccination in Wisconsin based on the document you provided:

 The 19 states that allow philosophical exemptions for persons who object to immunizations because of personal, moral or other nonreligious beliefs are Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania (by regulation), Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.  See also chart at  http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/2004exchart.htm] published by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

 

It comes to my attention, however, that the Federal Governments constant misinterpretation of the “Commerce Clause” which states that Congress shall have the power “[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States….”33  may still provide for some level of concern.  In many contemporary articles it has been largely concluded that in the 1700s the term “regulate” only meant to “promote” not infringe and therefore the contemporary legal interpretation is quite literally an antonym of the true Constitutional meaning by our founding fathers.  As such this one word has resulted in a great disservice to our freedom, rights and economy over the last ten decades.

 I suspect that with the imminent collapse of our economy resultant (after a short term boom that I have coined; “The Supernova Effect” similar to that experienced just prior to Black Friday of 1929) from this misinterpretation and misapplication of this term/clause along with the misinterpretation and application of the General Welfare Clause, will soon result in either the legal reversal of these interpretations and applications, at the Supreme Court level, or certain public revolt resulting from the economic and taxation calamity that remains before us,  just over the time horizon.  This, of course, would induce and tempt public officials to utilize “serious crisis” to usurp further powers that we the people did not authorized in The Constitution that we wrote, established and ordained on our Government which would, unimpeded, naturally result in utter despotism. 

 None-the-less such tyrannical actions would facilitate the obvious desire of self survival of Government power in terms of both size and scope.  In reality and all commonsense, if the Government is to remain “in power” at the full size and scope it currently has thus far usurped and enjoyed, what choice does it have but to proceed among Constitutionally contemptuous avenues when the complete economic collapse becomes readily apparent and the otherwise normal controlling effects of taxation (and tax credits) are no longer applicable and, indeed, true freedom, but unfortunately with ‘temporary’ but severe economic hardship, culminating in the restoration of Constitutional Principles as they ‘were’ intended, is thus restored?  It seems rather self-evident that the Government would play the “for public protection and best interests” card to induce at least the Tories and the cowards into submission and worry about the brave as they naturally separate out amongst the population in the process. 

 Such restoration of freedom principles and rebellion in favor of them, resultant from the collapse of The Matrix (our economy based on Monopoly money printed out of thin air) may result in the economics and liberty of pre-1913 (pre-General Welfare, pre-Commerce Cause misinterpretation and application, pre-Federal Reserve Act and pre-Sixteenth Amendment yielding incomprehensible savings of financial assets in the hands of the American people and our economy) when individual economic wealth expansion rates and individual power, for the vast majority of Americans, over Government was the envy of the world and resulted in the greatest individual prosperity growth in liberty the world has ever known.  In my personal opinion I don’t believe that the power and money corrupted ravenous hearts and minds at all levels, elected and nonelected, Democrat or Republican, in our Government and the Federal Reserve “System” (Cartel of 12 private banks) believe they can afford (or survive) that.  And, ultimately, that is the concern that is resulting in serious, logical and sensible growing mistrust of Government amongst a very large and expansive segment of our fellow countrymen.  And, therefore and thereby, why eternal vigilance in the face of the “Supernova Effect” or the alternate possibility of “The China Syndrome” (China and other nations selling out of American CDOs, U.S. bonds, and Dollars resulting in overnight hyper-inflation thus a nuclear financial core meltdown), with regards to any “serious crisis” as defined by Government (here or International such as United Nations / WHO), is the better part of discretion.

 Thank you for your promise to monitor the situation, Matt.  I remain,

 

Very truly yours in FREEDOM,

 

Capt. Karl

The Liberty Tree Lantern <hotlink

We The People Congress <hotlink

Marinette County Coordinator

Marinette/Menominee Sons and Daughters of Liberty 

 

P.S.:  What is up on AJR-51?

 

 From: Banaszynski, Matt [mailto:Matt.Banaszynski@legis.wisconsin.gov]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 9:40 AM
To: Karl P. Koenigs
Subject: RE: Quarantine Zones? Unconstitutional orders/legislation? Is this coming to Wisconsin too?

 

Karl,

 Thanks for the e-mail. I did some additional research and found this document that might interest you. We will continue to monitor the situation and let you know of any further developments.

 
~Matt

 

Matt Banaszynski
Research Aide
Office of State Representative John Nygren
Eighty-Ninth Assembly District
127 West – State Capitol
Phone: 608-266-2343
E-mail: Matt.Banaszynski@legis.wi.gov

---

From: Karl P. Koenigs [mailto:kkoenigs@new.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:05 PM
To: Banaszynski, Matt
Subject: Quarantine Zones? Unconstitutional orders/legislation? Is this coming to Wisconsin too?

Matt,

I forward this to show you that this public threat on our freedom does exist in Massachusetts.  This is scary..  This Government has the power to force isolation on anybody who refuses the H1N1 vaccine which has been shown to cause Autism and several other disorders?  Does Doyle have the power to sign an executive order that would put something like this in place “overnight”?

If anything like this comes up for the State of Wisconsin, I sure hope you will let me know right away.

I do know that Gov. Doyle has signed E.O. # 280 Proclamation Declaring a Public Health Emergency, attached.  I also know that the World Health Organization (WHO) has declared a code 6 level pandemic for the H1N1 which authorizes and requires vaccinations or quarantine.

I also have other concerns regarding economic influences that may induce Government authorities to come up with “reasons” for suspending Constitutional law.  I know that the U.S. Government “never wants a serious crisis to go to waste”.  I also know that they know what is going to happen if they raise taxes to the level that they must to sustain spending levels.  This “pandemic” according to recent reports of less health concern than the common flu, seems to be the perfect excuse to start tearing apart our Constitutional safe guards in a surprise attack to actually fend off problems resultant from the economic realities resultant from decades of Constitutional contempt with regards to, but not limited to, Article 1 Section 8 as further supported by the 9^th and 10^th Amendments in The Bill of Rights.

I pray that you will be my eyes and ears at the State Capitol with regards to this highly alarming matter.

On another but somewhat related matter, what is up on our State Sovereignty bill AJR 51

 

Very truly yours in FREEDOM,

Capt. Karl

The Liberty Tree Lantern <hotlink

We The People Congress <hotlink

Marinette County Coordinator

Marinette/Menominee Sons and Daughters of Liberty

 

 

 Pandemic Bill Passes House – Not over yet !!!

Posted Saturday October 10, 2009 at 1:15 pm by Bob Dwyer (district 4)

The Massachusetts House of Representatives passed H-4271 in formal session on October 8^th, 2009 by a vote of 114 yeas – 36 nays. (View Session Archive here: begins at 54 minutes)  The purpose of this bill is to remove all liability for the manufacturers and administrators of this under tested H1N1 vaccine.

 Mission Accomplished.

Interestingly enough, where 36 State Senators voted for S-2028 in a unanimous decision, 36 state Reps opposed the House version. The efforts of the MassLPA membership went not in vain, but in fact raised sufficient suspicion in the minds of many state representatives to get an equal amount of opposition in the House as proposition in the Senate. The roll call vote shows who the Representatives are that have paid homage to the Big Pharmaceuticals and Big Government lobbyists and which Reps. listened to their hearts and constituents to uphold our constitutional rights.

Hats off to State Reps. George Peterson and Brad Jones for speaking in behalf of the concerned citizens in a failed (22-124) effort to postpone this hearing and State Rep. Lewis Evangelidis for his statements against H4271.

In a public Statement by State Rep. Jeff Perry we find that his support for this bill does not address the most egregious aspects but focus on the warrant less searches and seizures, which was of course planted in the bill so that it could be the piece which if removed would be perceived as a victory for the civil liberties activists.

There are still many unconstitutional provisions left in the bill. Please contact your Reps. and Senators and tell them that you want your rights protected as that is why they were elected.

To: All State Representatives

Bill H-4271 (S-2028 amended) Ought To NOT PASS

“AN ACT RELATIVE TO PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPARATION AND RESPONSE IN THE COMMONWEALTH”

Unconstitutional clauses in H-4271: http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/house/186/ht04pdf/ht04217.pdf

• Public safety / health care / volunteer personnel waived from any criminal / civil liability for any civil or medical negligence / rights violations / death / injury (lines 19-24, 180-81, 190-192, 292-98)

• Allows dispensing controlled substances i.e. drugging people against their will (line 65)

• Persons violating unconstitutional orders of a local public health authority shall be punished by Up to: 6 months imprisonment / $1000 fine (lines 77-80)

• Government control over: transportation, materials, facilities, including but not limited to: communications, carriers, public utilities, fuels, food, clothing, shelter (lines 81-84)

• Determination of reasonable cause to believe that a “condition dangerous to public health” (could include firearms) exists or may exist authorizes: investigation, isolation, quarantine, obtain medical records and other information, monitor, prevent, control (lines 134-35, 204-210) Notwithstanding and regardless of any GOAL position, the chief author of the Model State bill used to craft S-2028 / H-4271 wrote / testified / promotes proven false theory that: “Firearms are a public health crisis … firearms actually make the public less safe.” H-4271 fails to exclude and protect 2nd Amendment / Article XVII well-regulated right to keep and bear tools from being determined by health authorities to be a “condition dangerous to public health”

• Forced isolation / quarantine to other private or public premises / area i.e. kidnapped / taken to undisclosed location / camp (lines 219-222)

• May take such action to assure maintenance of public health / may establish procedures to ensure continuation of essential public health (lines 4-14) >> too vague; opens door to abuse

• Not included: provision for just compensation for damages

Readers; You Need To Also See: Two Minute Warning to BIG BROTHER going ON-LINE: