Feed on
Posts
Comments

Archive for the 'rights' Category

In fact, of $609,072 given to Watt, $217,109 – or 35.6 percent – came from the money sector, including over $187,000 – or nearly 31 percent of his total contributions – from political action committees within the finance , insurance and real estate industry. The next highest industry supporting Watt was labor, which contributed only 14 percent of his total war chest.

Read Full Post »

“The language held in various discussions of this house is a proof that the doctrine (of implied open ended general welfare powers) in question was never entertained by this body. Arguments, wherever the subject would permit, have constantly been drawn from the peculiar nature of this government, as limited to certain enumerated powers, instead of extending, like other governments, to all cases not particularly excepted.”

Read Full Post »

The recently elected Wisconsin Delegates to THE “NEW” Continental Congress 2009 have arranged for a listening session at the Olympia Resort. This listening session will take place during the Wisconsin Patriot Group Conference also at the Olympia Resort. You may attend the listening session without registering for the conference. Here are the basics:

Read Full Post »

It’s time you and I put a stop to a renegade Federal Reserve by exposing the Fed’s out of control actions to the American people. And Congressman Ron Paul and Senator Jim DeMint have a bill before Congress to do just that, known as the “Audit the Fed” Bill (HR 1207 and S 604).

Read Full Post »

The final (as of October 26th) Wisconsin delegation for Continental Congress 2009 is, in order of number of votes:

Read Full Post »

Would any Republican be willing to force compliance with Constitutional Law in full force and effect? I don’t think that these liars would. And this comment is coming from a registered Republican and supporter of 32 years.

Read Full Post »

From a period that started around 1910 or so, there was a rising of so called “progressives” and progressive thinking. Today we often call such people “Liberals”. Without getting into a whole discussion into the makeup of these Liberals/Progressive just suffice it to say that, for various reasons they do not believe in freedom, liberty, individual prosperity or individual unalienable rights or individual power of the average citizen over our Government or being able to decide for ourselves how we are to live our lives or spend our earnings. Progressives feel that they know better than all of us and that we need to be controlled as much as possible because we don’t have the capacity to know what is actually good for us. They, therefore, believe in the “isms” of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism of the collective or in Marxist terminology “The Masses”; cronies, of course, excepted.

Read Full Post »

“The taxpayer has to worry. There is no way politically that Congress would let the PBGC fail to send checks to Grandma and Grandpa. Just like they rescued the savings-and-loans years ago without the legal obligation to do it, just like they rescued a number of banks without the legal obligation to do it, they’ll do the same thing with the PBGC if necessary,” Elliott said.

Still, even if the weak

Read Full Post »

More specifically, the group’s members, who number in the thousands, pledge to disobey orders they deem unlawful, including directives to disarm the American people and to blockade American cities. By refusing the latter order, the Oath Keepers hope to prevent cities from becoming “giant concentration camps,” a scenario the 44-year-old Rhodes says he can envision happening in the coming years.

Read Full Post »

As important as all the fights are that we’re in right now, perhaps the biggest of all is the fight over whether the government will take over the Internet. That’s because as long as the Internet is free, we can use it to communicate, educate, and organize. Tea parties, townhalls, and AFP events would be very difficult to organize if government owned and controlled the Internet and chose to interfere with it. That’s what’s at stake this week as the Federal Communications Commission decides on Thursday whether to move forward with so-called “net neutrality” regulations.

Read Full Post »

Next »