<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Liberty Tree Lantern &#187; Gasoline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/tag/gasoline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com</link>
	<description>America Rise Up! Congress Must Strictly Obey Constitutional Laws, As They "WERE" Intended, To Restore Our Freedom, Economy and Individual Prosperity. Let's Take Our Country Back!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do You Want To Know Why Gasoline Is So High?</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/10/30/do-you-want-to-know-why-gasoline-is-so-high/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/10/30/do-you-want-to-know-why-gasoline-is-so-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=3690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we the people would make the 'decison' to force the Obama Administration to release Oil and Gas drilling leases, WHERE THE OIL and GAS IS, the price of energy would plummet because there are many HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of barrels of crude oil and untold volumes of natural gas in the Western Federal Lands and Offshore.  The US Government IS selling leases all over America and even offshore in areas that they are confidently sure there is no Oil or Gas.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Regulatory Commissars: Oil Off Limits for Thriving Bears</h3>
<p>Believing themselves to be smarter than the average bear, bureaucrats in the Obama administration continue their quest to create a, well, bear market &#8212; at least for oil. The White House decided to designate more than 200,000 square miles of Alaskan land and coastline as &#8220;critical habitat&#8221; for polar bears &#8212; the same bear population that has reached greater numbers than previously recorded in history. In fact, despite what Al Gore and his fellow global warmists would have us believe, the population has actually risen by 40 percent since 1974.</p>
<p>This new non-endangered species habitat is enormous enough to qualify as the third largest state in the union, placing it between Texas and California in terms of square miles. Former UnitedHealth general counsel and now Assistant Interior Secretary Tom Strickland claimed at a news conference that the greatest threat to the bear is Arctic ice melt and that &#8220;we will continue to work to protect the polar bear and its fragile environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, the new designation as a critical habitat is the first step in requiring even more government consideration of the supposed negative effect on the escalating polar bear numbers before allowing oil and gas development. The state of Alaska responded by filing a complaint in an effort to stop the listing under the Endangered Species Act.</p>
<p>In the meantime, some 30 percent of the world&#8217;s gas supplies and 4 percent of the estimated global oil supply will be placed off limits because of this deceitful claim that the polar bear population is endangered. Next up, the loggerhead turtle, which, if listed as endangered, would bring regulations on everything along the eastern seaboard, including what lights you can put on the ocean-facing side of your house.</p>
<h2>Here are some more reasons:</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<h3><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55804">CNSNews.com &#8211; Interior Secretary Wants Probe of Bush <strong>&#8230;</strong></a></h3>
</li>
</ul>
<h4><a href="http://www.nationalforestlawblog.com/apps/blog/show/1896798-obama-administration-blocking-domestic-oil-leases">Obama Administration Blocking Domestic Oil Leases</a></h4>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><img style="width: 16px;height: 16px" src="http://images.freewebs.com/static/global/profile_images/noProfilePic_100x100.gif" alt="" /> Posted by nationalforestlawblog at 09:06 PM on October 08, 2009</td>
<td align="right" valign="middle"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<p><img src="http://www.nationalforestlawblog.com/gas%20well.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Utah &#8211; Contrary to his campaign pronouncements to free the U.S. from foreign oil, the Obama administration is blocking oil leases awarded last year</strong>.  The move would put the land off limit to oil and gas exploration.   You can read these articles from the <em><strong><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13515553">Salt Lake Tribune</a>, <a href="http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/interior_halts_some_utah_leases_oks_others_defers_most/C37/L37/">New West</a> </strong></em>and a couple blurbs from the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125502810592574097.html"><em><strong>Wall Street Journal</strong></em></a> and on <a href="http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2009/10/interior-issues-report-drilling-near-national-parks-utah4714"><em><strong>National Parks Traveler.  </strong></em></a></p>
<p>The bottomline, folks, is that the Obama Administration is PURPOSEFULLY causing electric, heat, gasoline, food and all transportation prices to skyrocket for all Americans &#8211; ON PURPOSE.  If you doubt this writer, would you believe Barack Obama if he told you himself?  Or would you call him a complete liar?  The only question you need to ask yourself is; Is Barack Obama a liar?  If you don&#8217;t think he is a liar that means that you believe him when he says;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>As you can see and hear for yourself, besides <strong>SIGNIFICANTLY</strong> raising the cost of living, for all Americans, by purposely causing the production of oil and gas energy to be slowed way down as highlighted above, he and the US Congress wants to tax the living heck out of it, the cost of such taxes to be passed down to every single American who turns on lights and/or heats their home.  Once Barack Obama and his hand selected &#8220;green&#8221; Socialist / Communists accomplish their &#8220;change&#8221; few of us will be able to afford to live anymore.  How are you doing with your bills and taxes right now?  All of your bills, right down to food and all taxes will be going up DRAMATICALLY over the next year.  And most Socialists and all Tories amongst us thinks that is a very very good thing.  Just ask them.  You should consider yourself lucky if you have any &#8220;change&#8221; left in your pocket in about one year. </p>
<p>If we the people would make the &#8216;decison&#8217; to force the Obama Administration to release Oil and Gas drilling leases, <span style="color: #0000ff">WHERE THE OIL and GAS IS</span>, the price of energy would plummet because there are many HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of barrels of crude oil and untold volumes of natural gas in the Western Federal Lands and Offshore.  The US Government IS selling leases all over America and even offshore in areas that they are confidently sure there is no Oil or Gas. </p>
<p>It is The Liberty Tree Lantern&#8217;s opinion that this sham by the US Government, which is affecting our lives and, combined with this economy and job loss, may even kill some of us this winter, must end.  Letting the Federal Government compel us have to live with icicles hanging from our nostils shouldn&#8217;t be allowed by us &#8211; We The People.   Wake UP, people!  Don&#8217;t let the Federal Government do this to us!  In a &#8220;free&#8221; society, in the end, it is us that borrowed them our authority, we do have the right and the duty to take it back in the face of utter despotism and tyranny.  See: <a href="http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm">The Declaration of Independence</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/10/30/do-you-want-to-know-why-gasoline-is-so-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Benefits from America&#8217;s Industrial Demise?</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/15/who-benefits-from-americas-industrial-demise/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/15/who-benefits-from-americas-industrial-demise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-n-tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-n-Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=3113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Numerous studies have documented how the grossly misnamed Affordable Energy Act of 2009, also known as Cap and Trade or more accurately Cap and Tax, will raise the cost of energy for every American.  If the cost of all energy rises dramatically, will industrial production stay in this country or will it move to China or India that is not constrained by the cost of energy regulations?  China and India already enjoy a significant cost advantage over American producers in many fields; this will just exacerbate that advantage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>by David Nace</h4>
<p>Like it or not we live in a global economy.  If the Obama administration enacts policies that make it too expensive to manufacture products in the United States, those products will be made in other countries and shipped here.</p>
<p>Numerous studies have documented how the grossly misnamed Affordable Energy Act of 2009, also known as Cap and Trade or more accurately Cap and Tax, will raise the cost of energy for every American.  If the cost of all energy rises dramatically, will industrial production stay in this country or will it move to China or India that is not constrained by the cost of energy regulations?  China and India already enjoy a significant cost advantage over American producers in many fields; this will just exacerbate that advantage.</p>
<p>While the US taxpayers are paying to support the preservation of United Auto Workers jobs, with outlandish pay and benefit costs, at GM and Chrysler, the same administration is willing to drive industrial production overseas.  Perhaps this is why the administration is also supporting Card Check legislation that will allow easy unionization of millions of workers in the service industries.  It knows that its other policies will destroy millions of well paying industrial jobs in this country.  Based upon the Spanish government&#8217;s experiences with subsidizing alternative energy sources through higher conventional energy prices, Cap and Tax will destroy 2 million jobs per year in this country.</p>
<p>For such a damaging plan to be seriously considered there must be a group that benefits from its passage.  Just as Joseph Kennedy benefited handsomely from FDR&#8217;s programs in the 1930&#8217;s, it turns out that some of main benefactors of this program are also politically very well connected.</p>
<p>In 2004, Al Gore, former Vice President and author of Inconvenient Truth, started Generational Investment Management (GIM) to provide funding to businesses associated with alternative energy.   GIM also happens to own 10% of the Chicago Climate Exchange, which will issue the carbon credits that Cap and Tax legislation is based upon.</p>
<p>In 2007, Al Gore became a partner in the venture capital firm of Kleiman, Perkins, Claufield and Byers (KPCB).  This firm is heavily invested in renewable energy and electrical grid improvements.  The market for their products is almost completely dependent on government programs in the form of subsidies, tax breaks or regulation.  Al Gore&#8217;s contribution to KPCB is to promote government intervention into the energy markets.</p>
<p>It is not surprising that venture capital firms and investment firms that will have a stake in the trading of carbon credits, have made extensive campaign contributions to those legislators proposing Cap and Trade legislation.  Clearly, the American public looses in the form of higher energy costs and lost jobs however, a few politically well connected individuals will have much to gain as the result of further government regulation of energy consumption.</p>
<p><em>David Nace is a Liberty Features Syndicated writer.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/15/who-benefits-from-americas-industrial-demise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life Blood of Freedom Found in Gulf And Available Around America</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/07/life-blood-of-freedom-found-in-gulf-and-available-around-america/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/07/life-blood-of-freedom-found-in-gulf-and-available-around-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drill Here]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drill Now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic impact of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=3032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God created all sorts of energy resources, only a few of which have been developed and utilized to drive our economy.  Energy is the life blood of freedom and it is what allows our economy to produce individual wealth for all Americans.  And, this is why energy, in all forms, is so very important to the average working American.  Cheap inexpensive oil is what results in the costs of everything to go down to reasonable affordable levels for us all.  When energy is inexpensive it is also an incentive for Americans to start new small businesses, because then it is easier to make a good profit, and therefore lower energy costs results in hundreds of thousands of new jobs and allows for significant increases in money available for wages on the shop floor or out in the field.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>God created all sorts of energy resources, only a few of which have been developed and utilized to drive our economy.  Energy is the life blood of freedom and it is what allows our economy to produce individual wealth for all Americans.  And, this is why energy, in all forms, is so very important to the average working American.  Cheap inexpensive oil is what results in the costs of everything to go down to reasonable affordable levels for us all.  When energy is inexpensive it is also an incentive for Americans to start new small businesses, because then it is easier to make a good profit, and therefore lower energy costs results in hundreds of thousands of new jobs and allows for significant increases in money available for wages on the shop floor or out in the field.</p>
<p>Energy prices, like prices for everything, are determined by the principles of supply and demand.  The more supply of energy the United States has available to meet the demand of our large and small businesses and individual needs and desires the less it costs.  That is why we the American people have so much power to lower the cost of our energy and make ourselves individually more wealthy.</p>
<p>The fact is that there are HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of barrels of oil and vast volumes of natural gas available DOMESTICALLY right here in and around America.  In addition America has vast resources in coal energy.  Combining the unfathomable quantities of these resources with new developing energy sources would immensely improve all of our families’ economic conditions.  The Liberty Tree Lantern is astonished at how little the mainstream media is reporting all of the new and existing volumes of domestic energy available for us.  We also find it interesting how little it is reported that the Obama Administration is standing in the way of releasing the leases necessary to drill and harvest these vast resources that would so greatly improve our economy and restore the prosperity of individual citizens.</p>
<p>What we need to do as Americans is to get together and with one Tea Party like voice demand that Obama and his Secretary of The Interior release the leases that our Oil companies need to drill for oil out west on federal lands and offshore all around our country and Alaska so that we can build up America and strengthen our freedom through massive infusions of domestic energy.</p>
<p>The Liberty Tree Lantern is happy to provide just one story, of dozens of available, regarding domestic American energy just waiting for the Obama Administration to let us produce the energy we so desperately need to lower our costs of everything.   Please send a personal message to Congress via, paper, e-mail and phone that you want Obama to release the drilling leases immediately.  Tell them to DRILL  HERE AND DRILL NOW!  (Do you know that Obama is stealing American taxpayer money to “give” to Brazil for ‘them’ to drill for oil offshore?  See:  <a title="Permanent Link to U.S. Taxpayers to Provide Financing To Brazil for “Their” Offshore Drilling" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/03/3013/">U.S. Taxpayers to Provide Financing To Brazil for “Their” Offshore Drilling</a>)</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aGOdeaS1rjQ&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aGOdeaS1rjQ&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>When you write or talk to your Congressman, make sure that you mention that the LAST thing we need are taxes on energy that will increase costs on every single thing the American family needs to live and businesses need to create well paying jobs.  Reject Cap-n-TAX in any form, folks, because such taxes will set our entire country back by decades destroy jobs, wealth, savings and create poverty.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Liberty Tree Lantern has a few questions for our readers to ponder: </p>
<ol>
<li>Why, after the people of America demanded that the ban on offshore and western Federal Lands expire, which it did some months ago now, has the Obama Administration withheld exploration leases and not allowed oil companies to go where they know the domestic oil likely is for exploration and harvest? </li>
<li>Why is the Obama Administration keeping America from our own domestic energy instead of depending on and importing energy from other countries?</li>
<li>Why doesn&#8217;t the majority of mainstream media report on the Billions of Barrels of crude oil available in Western Federal Lands and offshore when this energy would obviously improve the lives of so many Americans?</li>
<li>America is in a horrible recession RIGHT NOW that could OBVIOUSLY be greatly remedied by dramatically increasing that availability of our own massive volumes of domestic energy, doesn&#8217;t the Obama Administration care about the average individual American who is out of work and quickly running out of money due to job loss and increased prices on utility bills, gasoline, food and just about everything else?</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/07/life-blood-of-freedom-found-in-gulf-and-available-around-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Taxpayers to Provide Financing To Brazil for &#8220;Their&#8221; Offshore Drilling</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/03/3013/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/03/3013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security & Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drill here and drill now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Kerpin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=3013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This administration is actually going to force you to pay for offshore drilling in Brazil, at the same time they try to block offshore drilling here in America!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 442px;height: 846px" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="442">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Dear Karl,</p>
<p>Activists like you won an amazing policy victory last year when public outrage forced Congress to finally end its ban on offshore drilling, after 26 long years of keeping America’s vast energy resources in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) locked up and off the market.A year later, the Obama administration is doing everything it can to drag its feet and prevent us from accessing American energy resources. They are trying to ignore the millions of Americans who demanded access to American energy resources by secretly putting the ban back in place.</p>
<p>Even more amazing and outrageous: the Obama administration is now actually poised to lend $2 billion from U.S. taxpayers to the Brazilian national oil company, Petrobras, for offshore drilling in Brazil.</p>
<p><strong>This administration is actually going to force you to pay for offshore drilling in Brazil, at the same time they try to block offshore drilling here in America!</strong></p>
<p>Fortunately, you can do something about it. The Obama administration is required by law to listen to public comments on the subject of energy exploration and production in the OCS.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://capwiz.com/americansforprosperity/utr/1/DQOHLEPRFG/MGEILETOXI/3878976446">Please click here to tell the Obama administration to allow offshore drilling here in America!</a></strong></p>
<p>Offshore drilling in the OCS would be a real economic stimulus that would create jobs and economic growth by actually producing something. A study from ICF International estimates more than 160,000 well-paying American jobs would be created from allowing oil and gas drilling offshore. Government policy to prevent these jobs by banning access to our own resources is completely unacceptable at a time of 9.4 percent unemployment.</p>
<p>According to federal government estimates, the OCS contains 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. We all remember what a hardship it was when gas prices spiked over $4 a gallon last year. We also remember being told that allowing drilling wouldn’t help because it could take years for the new energy sources to reach the market. Well that’s why we can’t wait until the next price spike to start drilling. We need to drill here in America, and do it now.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://capwiz.com/americansforprosperity/utr/1/DQOHLEPRFG/IBYHLETOXJ/3878976446">Please click here to tell the Obama administration to allow offshore drilling here in America!</a></strong></p>
<p>We only have three weeks until the docket closes on September 21 to make our voices heard, and the radical environmentalists will be sure to weigh in from the other side. Please comment today and pass this email on to anyone you know who can help.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Phil Kerpen</p>
<p>Director of Policy</p>
<p>Americans for Prosperity</p>
<p><a href="http://capwiz.com/americansforprosperity/utr/1/DQOHLEPRFG/HTESLETOXK/3878976446">http://twitter.com/kerpen</a></p>
<p><a href="http://capwiz.com/americansforprosperity/utr/1/DQOHLEPRFG/IDMJLETOXL/3878976446">http://facebook.com/PhilKerpen</a></p>
<p> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">Dear readers of The Liberty Tree Lantern,</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">We have been posting several articles about the importance of the Obama Administration to release the leases to the oil companies so that we the people of America can benefit from the MASSIVE quantities of energy that our dear Lord has blessed us with in the western federal lands as well as offshore all around America and in Alaska.  Once we rebuild America from the collapse of &#8220;The MATRIX&#8221; we are going to really need a lot of &#8220;domestic&#8221; energy to supply the huge economy that will be created from the U.S. Government being FORCED to comply with the LAWs that we wrote in the Constitution to bind them to ONLY SEVENTEEN &#8216;enumerated&#8217; things, &#8220;listed&#8221; in the Constitution, that We The People &#8216;borrowed&#8217; them OUR authority that we were given by God, to handle.  When our Government collapses down to the size and spending level called for in the enumerated powers clauses, it will only be 1/5th its current size and spending level.  The balance will remain in our productive hands and in our economy.  That is going to take a huge amount of energy where we need ALL SOURCES of energy to feed, because then the vast majority of our average common citizens will become wealthy off of their own hard work, sweat and risk.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">In the meantime we could all use a little relief at the pump and on our utility bills.  Once all of these leases are released by Obama and his Administration, the cost of a barrel of oil will drop dramatically and will aid our economy and employment immensely.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff">So please so contact our Government and follow the recommendation of my friend Mr. Phil Kerpin.  &#8211; - <em>Capt. Karl</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/03/3013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 out of 3 Americans oppose carbon taxes</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/07/22/2-out-of-3-americans-oppose-carbon-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/07/22/2-out-of-3-americans-oppose-carbon-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-n-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high cost of living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high utility bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/07/22/2-out-of-3-americans-oppose-carbon-taxes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost half of the Americans who responded to a new poll say they have concerns about the impact of carbon dioxide on the climate, but two out of three say they have no interest whatsoever in opening their wallets to pay for any mitigation. 

Asked whether they "believe that man-produced carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases will induce catastrophic climate change" if unaddressed, 49.6 percent of the respondents said yes. Twenty-seven percent said no, and 23.4 percent were uncertain. The concern from Democrats and Republicans was reversed with Democrats saying 10-1 yes and Republicans saying 2-1 no.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Survey shows huge majority resists opening wallets for Cap-and-Trade<br />
<hr size="1" /></h3>
<p>Posted: July 21, 2009<br />
9:09 pm Eastern</p>
<p>By Bob Unruh<br />
© 2009 WorldNetDaily</p>
<p><strong>Editor&#8217;s note:</strong> <em>This is another is a series of monthly &#8220;Freedom Index&#8221; polls conducted exclusively for WND by the public <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">opinion</a> research and media consulting company <a href="http://wenzelstrategies.com/?page_id=307/">Wenzel Strategies. </a></em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Almost half of the Americans who responded to a new poll say they have concerns about the impact of carbon dioxide on the climate, but two out of three say they have no interest whatsoever in opening their wallets to pay for any mitigation.</p>
<p><img style="border: 0px" src="http://www.wnd.com/images/heatwave1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<p>Asked whether they &#8220;believe that man-produced carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases will induce catastrophic climate change&#8221; if unaddressed, 49.6 percent of the respondents said yes. Twenty-seven percent said no, and 23.4 percent were uncertain. The concern from Democrats and Republicans was reversed with Democrats saying 10-1 yes and Republicans saying 2-1 no.</p>
<p>However, when asked if they were willing to &#8220;pay significantly higher energy bills in the hope of heading off what some scientists believe to be impending climate change,&#8221; 63.6 percent said no. That included Democrats by a margin of almost 3-1 and members of the GOP by 12-1.</p>
<p>The WND/Wenzel <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">survey</a> was conducted July 12-17 using an automated telephone technology calling a random sampling of listed telephone numbers nationwide. The survey included 16 questions and carries a 95 percent confidence interval. It included 807 adult respondents. It carries a margin of error of +/– 3.4 percentage points.</p>
<p>&#8220;This dramatizes the decades-old problem that environmental activists have had in pushing for structural change in society to accommodate fears of environmental doom – many people may agree that some long-term harm may befall humanity, but they are much more concerned about the short-term cost,&#8221; said pollster Fritz Wenzel.</p>
<p>&#8220;After an unusually cold winter followed by a summer where U.S. temperatures have been unusually mild, the urgency to act is clearly waning in the minds of many,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Only 15.2 percent responded they are willing to pay much more, while 21.2 percent said they were uncertain.</p>
<p>Asked about the pending &#8220;cap and trade&#8221; legislation in Congress that restricts the amount of carbon dioxide and <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">water</a> vapor that can be produced – generating financial penalties for violators – only 23.7 percent of the respondents support the measure.</p>
<p>Nearly 42 percent opposed it and another 35 percent were unsure.</p>
<p>&#8220;As the U.S. Senate considers the bill, the fact that fewer than one in four Americans favors its passage should give them serious pause,&#8221; Wenzel commented.</p>
<p>The core of the opposition appeared to be the costs, but Americans also were worried about the impact on the economy from rocketing prices for gasoline, natural gas, electricity and other sources of <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">energy</a>.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=45131">Learn how close to home &#8220;global governance&#8221; really is by reading Jerome Corsi&#8217;s New York Times best-seller, &#8220;The Late Great USA.&#8221; This weekend only, get an autographed, hardcover copy for only $4.95 &#8211; a $21 discount!</a></em></p>
<p>&#8220;Nearly half – 46 percent said they think it will harm the economy. And while President Obama and other Democrats have been touting the concept of &#8216;green jobs&#8217; as the savior of the wallowing economy, few are buying it, our polling shows,&#8221; according to Wenzel.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just 17 percent said they think &#8216;Cap and Trade&#8217; will help the economy. Even Democrats are unconvinced – just 26 percent said they think it will help the economy, while an identical percentage of Democrats said it will cause economic harm,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>There also were significant doubts about the constitutionality of the tax program and concerns about its wisdom.</p>
<p>Fewer than 25 voters out of 100 believed the plan to limit production of natural gases that are not actual pollutants, such as carbon dioxide and water vapor event, is constitutional. Nearly 32 percent said it violates the nation&#8217;s founding document, and about 43 percent were unsure.</p>
<p>Forty-five percent said it just isn&#8217;t wise for the <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">government</a> to attempt it, and 30 percent said they weren&#8217;t sure. Only 24.9 percent agreed with the wisdom of the taxing program.</p>
<p>&#8220;Even among those who voted for Obama in the November elections, less than one-third (30 percent) said they believed it was constitutional. And, among those same Obama voters, just 31 percent said they thought it was wise to try to regulate man–breathed carbon dioxide and water vapor,&#8221; Wenzel said.</p>
<p>&#8220;[It] creates a problem for the Obama <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">administration</a> at a time when his job approval rating is sinking and his legislative agenda remains packed with controversial proposals,&#8221; Wenzel said. &#8220;With the public so heavily weighted against it, to pass &#8216;Cap and Trade&#8217; may cost the Obama administration much more political capital than it can afford, especially given the looming battle over health care reform.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wenzel is president of Wenzel Strategies a public opinion research and media consulting company. Formerly associated with Zogby International, he spent 25 years as a news and political reporter for major metro dailies.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103634">WND recently reported</a> when former Vice President Al Gore, whose &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221; video epistle on the claims of global warming has not weathered recent scientific research, promised at a conference in the United Kingdom that the impending virtual energy <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">tax</a> under the U.S. &#8220;cap-and-trade&#8221; legislation will bring about &#8220;global governance.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103634">Gore, </a><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=93315">who this year famously left his Nashville mansion&#8217;s driveway brightly illuminated</a> during the &#8220;Earth Hour&#8221; event that promoted energy savings, was speaking at the Smith School World Forum on Enterprise and the <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">Environment</a>.</p>
<p>He said the &#8220;cap-and-trade&#8221; legislation will be beneficial.</p>
<p>&#8220;But it is the awareness itself that will drive the change, and one of the ways it will drive the change is through global government and global agreements,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4sPkZBfDl0">His address was captured on video and posted on YouTube:</a></p>
<p>Only a few weeks ago, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=92557">a former NASA climatologist asserted global warming simply isn&#8217;t happening.</a></p>
<p>While so-called &#8220;global warming&#8221; was supposed to bring more and more horrific hurricanes, according to many scientists and politicians, since 2005 only one major hurricane has struck North America.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=102750">WND also reported</a> that a team of scientists with years of expertise in climate issues recently wrote to Congress asserting the &#8220;sky is not falling&#8221; and there is no evidence man is causing global warming.</p>
<p>The letter was signed by physics professors Robert H. Austin and William Happer of Princeton, environmental <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">sciences</a> professor S. Fred Singer of the University of Virginia, retired manager for <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=104619" target="_top">strategic planning</a> at ExxonMobil Roger Cohen, physics professor (emeritus) Harold W. Lewis at UC-Santa Barbara and others.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=64734">WND also has reported</a> on the <a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/">Petition Project,</a> which has compiled the signatures of more than 31,000 scientists, including some 9,000 Ph.D.s, who flatly reject the &#8220;global warming&#8221; agenda</p>
<p><em><a href="mailto:media@wnd.com">If you are a member of the media and would like to interview Fritz Wenzel about this story, please e-mail. </a></em></p>
<p><strong>See detailed results of survey questions:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/files/July11.pdf">Do you believe that man-produced carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases will induce catastrophic climate change on the planet if they are not addressed?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/files/July12.pdf">The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed a Cap and Trade bill that restricts the amount of carbon dioxide and water vapor that can be produced and imposed stiff penalties on violators. Supporters say it will help stop global climate change, but critics say it won&#8217;t help and will cause significant increases in the cost of energy and other products. Based on what you know about this bill, do you favor it or oppose it?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/files/July13.pdf">Are you willing to pay significantly higher energy bills in the hope of heading off what some scientists believe to be impending climate change?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/files/July14.pdf">If it becomes law, how do you think the Cap and Trade bill will affect the U.S. economy?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/files/July15.pdf">Do you believe it is constitutional for the U.S. government to impose limits on the production of natural gases that are not actual pollutants, such as man-produced carbon dioxide and water vapor?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/files/July16.pdf">Do you believe it is wise for the U.S. government to impose limits on the production of natural gases that are not actual pollutants?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/07/22/2-out-of-3-americans-oppose-carbon-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9/12 mania: Massive tea party storms D.C.</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/07/14/912-mania-massive-tea-party-storms-d-c/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/07/14/912-mania-massive-tea-party-storms-d-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaration of Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality and Virtue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security & Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security and Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trilateral Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We The People Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media-bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork barrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/12 Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonstration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unalienable rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withholding taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Our mission is to present a unified voice of concern over the current administration's policies regarding taxation, our economy, foreign and domestic policy, as well as our individual constitutional rights as American citizens," said Grassfire national coordinator Darla Dawald in an open invitation to the public to join the Sept. 12 taxpayer march in Washington, D.C. "America is in trouble, the problems and issues are broad and complex and it will take a monumental effort to stop, change and reverse the destructive course that this administration and Congress has put us on. Together, We the People can effect that change!"

"People want to do this," he said. "The people who have been protesting around the country want to come to Washington and do this in D.C. In a lot of ways, they are being ignored and the media is underrepresenting them and their numbers. They want to come together for one big event and send a very clear message."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Patriots take fight for America directly to Capitol Hill</p>
<hr size="1" /></h2>
<p>Posted: July 13, 2009<br />
8:27 pm Eastern</p>
<p>By Chelsea Schilling<br />
© 2009 WorldNetDaily</p>
<p>Thousands of taxpayers from across the nation are planning to descend on Washington, D.C., to take their fight against excessive spending, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">bailouts</a>, growth of big government and soaring deficits to the <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">front door</a> of the U.S. Capitol – and they say lawmakers can&#8217;t hide from their loud and clear message.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the912project.com/">Fox News&#8217; Glenn Beck has been promoting the 9-12 Project</a> to bring citizens back &#8220;to the place we were on September 12, 2001.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The day after America was attacked we were not obsessed with Red States, Blue States or political parties,&#8221; the 9-12 <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">Project</a> website states. &#8220;We were united as Americans, standing together to protect the values and principles of the greatest nation ever created.&#8221;</p>
<p>On his show, Beck called Americans to forget about party politics and fight for the return to basic principles upon which the nation was founded.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our economy is tanking. It doesn&#8217;t show signs of improving,&#8221; Beck said. &#8220;There are people losing <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">jobs</a>, and it doesn&#8217;t look like there is more help on the way there; there are more cuts on the way. People around the world are taking to the streets. Our government responds with bailouts, and when you call them up and say &#8216;What are you doing?&#8217; you don&#8217;t get any response. They&#8217;re not listening to you.&#8221;</p>
<p>The White House has not responded to WND&#8217;s request for comment.</p>
<p>Beck continued, &#8220;Ponzi scheme crooks get away with millions, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">tax</a> cheats are getting promotions, terrorists are on the run, and you just want your family safe. You just want your children to grow up in a sane country, and you don&#8217;t want anybody indoctrinating your kids when they get to school. I think a lot of people feel like they&#8217;re alone and they just want to give up. I&#8217;m here to tell you something important, and that is: You are not alone.&#8221;</p>
<p><em><a href="http://shop.wnd.com/store/subdept.asp?SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=247">Get ready for Sept. 12! Visit the one and only &#8220;tea party store&#8221; now.</a></em></p>
<p>Beck said Americans were busy &#8220;burying our heads in the sand&#8221; or &#8220;playing politics&#8221; on Sept. 10, 2001.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was about Republicans or Democrats,&#8221; he said. &#8220;On 9/11, we were freaking out and no one knew who attacked us. … On 9/12, no one in the government had to tell us what to do. We just did it. … We gathered our families together. We prayed. We were the people that our grandparents were, and nobody had to tell us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then the political parties got involved, he said, and Americans went back to their partisan squabbling.</p>
<p><span><a href="http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/24/mission-statement/"><img src="http://www.wnd.com/images/9-12.jpg" alt="" width="501" height="185" /></a><br />
</span></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/24/mission-statement/"></a></p>
<p>The 9-12 Project challenges Americans to recommit themselves to the following principles:</p>
<ol>
<li>America is good.</li>
<li>I believe in God and He is the Center of my life.</li>
<li>I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday</li>
<li>The family is sacred. My family and I are the ultimate authority, not the government.</li>
<li>If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it.</li>
<li>I have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but there is no guarantee of equal results.</li>
<li>I <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">work</a> hard for what I have and I will share it with who I want to. Government cannot force me to be charitable.</li>
<li>It is not un-American for me to disagree with authority or to share my personal opinion.</li>
<li>The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me.</li>
</ol>
<p>And the project also emphasizes the following 12 values:</p>
<ol>
<li>honesty</li>
<li>reverence</li>
<li>hope</li>
<li>thrift</li>
<li>humility</li>
<li>charity</li>
<li>sincerity</li>
<li>moderation</li>
<li>hard work</li>
<li>courage</li>
<li>personal responsibility</li>
<li>gratitude</li>
</ol>
<p>&#8220;Become a 9-12er,&#8221; Beck said. &#8220;Forget about arguing about the parties. … Forget about it. It is a waste of time, and I really believe time is running out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Above all, he said, the No. 1 principle Americans must stand for is re-establishment of the Constitution.</p>
<p><a href="http://912dc.org/"><img src="http://www.wnd.com/images/taxpayermarch.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.wnd.com/images/taxpayermarch.jpg"></a></p>
<p>In a major movement unaffiliated with – but inspired by – Beck&#8217;s 9-12 Project, called <a href="http://912dc.org/">the National Taxpayer Protest</a>, thousands of Americans are answering the call and booking travel arrangements to make their voices heard at Capitol Hill on Sept. 12.</p>
<p><a href="http://912dc.org/"></a>Several organizations have united to help organize the tea party movement&#8217;s descent on the Capitol, including: Freedom Works, Grassfire/ResistNet, Tea Party Patriots, National Taxpayers Union, Club for Growth, Americans for Tax Reform, Young Americans for Liberty, Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights, Our Country Deserves Better, Campaign for Liberty, Leadership Institute, Free Republic, Young America&#8217;s Foundation, the National Association of Rural <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">Land Owners</a> and Smart Girl Politics.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=3118">Get your copy of &#8220;Joe the Plumber: Fighting for the American Dream&#8221; now!</a></em></p>
<p>&#8220;Our mission is to present a unified voice of concern over the current administration&#8217;s policies regarding taxation, our economy, foreign and domestic policy, as well as our individual constitutional rights as American citizens,&#8221; said Grassfire national coordinator Darla Dawald in an open invitation to the public to <a href="http://912dc.org/">join the Sept. 12 taxpayer march in Washington, D.C</a>. &#8220;America is in trouble, the problems and issues are broad and complex and it will take a monumental effort to stop, change and reverse the destructive course that this administration and Congress has put us on. Together, We the People can effect that change!&#8221;</p>
<p>On Sept. 10 and 11, the groups will host grassroots training seminars and Sept. 11 &#8220;We&#8217;ll Never Forget&#8221; memorial. The taxpayer march is scheduled to begin at the Lincoln Memorial at 10 a.m. Sept. 12 and culminate with a rally at 1 p.m. in front of the Capitol.</p>
<p>The National Taxpayer Protest website offers <a href="http://912dc.org/getting-here/">detailed information on travel and hotel accommodations</a>, including directions to the event. <a href="http://912dc.org/event-registration/">Tea party attendees may RSVP there as well</a>.</p>
<p>More than 9,000 people have already registered through the protest <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">website</a>, and the number is growing rapidly.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama managed to have 4 million show up at the Capitol grounds,&#8221; Dawald told WND. &#8220;We need to do the same if not more. The financial situation is dire, but as one gentleman said, &#8216;If I have to sell my belongings and crawl there, I will – because it&#8217;s that important!&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Jenny Beth Martin of <a href="http://teapartypatriots.org/">Tea Party Patriots</a> told WND the groups are focused on &#8220;protecting the values and principles that have made America the greatest nation for future generations.&#8221;</p>
<p>She said a confirmed list of speakers and performers will be released soon.</p>
<p>Brendan Steinhauser of <a href="http://www.freedomworks.org/">FreedomWorks</a> said the movement is gaining momentum as taxpayers plan trips to Washington to join the fight against big government.</p>
<p>&#8220;People want to do this,&#8221; he said. &#8220;The people who have been protesting around the country want to come to Washington and do this in D.C. In a lot of ways, they are being ignored and the media is underrepresenting them and their numbers. They want to come together for one big event and send a very clear message.&#8221;</p>
<p> <img style="border: 0px" src="http://www.wnd.com/images/090705washdcteaparty.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="500">Tea partiers in Washington D.C. on Independence Day weekend</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/24/mission-statement/">Beck&#8217;s 9-12 Project mission statement</a> explains:</p>
<p>We want to get everyone thinking like it is Sept. 12, 2001, again. Ask yourself these questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Do you <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">watch</a> the direction that America is being taken in and feel powerless to stop it?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Do you believe that your voice isn&#8217;t loud enough to be heard above the noise anymore?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Do you read the headlines everyday and feel an empty pit in your stomach … as if you&#8217;re completely alone?</li>
</ul>
<p>If you&#8217;ve answered YES, then you&#8217;ve fallen for the Wizard of Oz lie. While the voices you hear in the distance may sound intimidating, as if they surround us from all sides – the reality is very different. Once you pull back the curtain, you realize that there are only a few people pressing the buttons, and their voices are weak. The truth is that they don&#8217;t surround us at all.</p>
<p>We surround them.</p>
<p>As part of his own challenge to America, Beck asked patriots to get together with friends and talk about the country, its values, principles and Founding Fathers&#8217; original purpose. He said to stay focused in the quest to take the America back.</p>
<p>&#8220;Believe me America, I am as tired as you are. I love my country,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It&#8217;s not the parties or anything else. It&#8217;s the principles behind this country. Stand up and fight for them.&#8221;</p>
<p>WND readers have been sending information on other upcoming tea parties. <a href="http://www.teapartypatriots.org/Default.aspx?state=Alabama">Tea Party Patriots also lists events by state on its website</a>, including the follwoing:</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Alabama</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:Wetumpkateaparty@yahoo.com"><strong>Wetumpka</strong></a>– Saturday, September 5, time to be announced, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=103412" target="_top">Gold</a> Star Park, Shelby Street, downtown</p>
<p align="center"><strong>California</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="mailto:info@bostonianteaparty.com"><strong>Redding</strong></a>– Friday, July 17, 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., location to be announced</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Florida</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:billie@ceoservicebureau.com"><strong>Jacksonville</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, time to be announced, Riverwalk</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Georgia</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Albany</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Bishop&#8217;s Albany office, 235 Roosevelt Avenue Albany Tower</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Athens</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Broun&#8217;s Athens office, 3706 Atlanta Hwy.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Atlanta</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, at Rep. Lewis&#8217; district office, the Equitable building, 100 Peachtree Street, NW</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Augusta</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Barrow&#8217;s Augusta office, 925 Laney Walker Blvd. </p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Brunswick</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Jack Kingston&#8217;s Brunswick office, 805 Gloucester Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Canton</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Price&#8217;s Canton office, 100 North Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Columbus</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Bishop&#8217;s Columbus office, 18 Ninth Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Dalton</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Deal&#8217;s Dalton office, 415 E. Walnut Avenue</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Dublin</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Marshall&#8217;s Dublin office, 503 Bellevue Avenue</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Evans</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Broun&#8217;s Augusta/Evans office, 4246 Washington Rd.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Gainesville</strong></a> – Friday, July 17,12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Deal&#8217;s Gainesville office, 500 Jesse Jewel Pkwy</p>
<p><a href="mailto:teapartytownscounty@live.com"><strong>Hiawassee</strong></a> – Saturday, July 18, line up at 9:45 a.m., parade starts at 11 at 20 Main Street (Hwy 76) in parking lots behind bank and McConnell Memorial Church</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Jonesboro</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Scott Jonesboro&#8217;s office, 173 North Main Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Lafayette</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Deal&#8217;s Lafayette office, 108 W. LaFayette Square</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Lawrenceville</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Linder&#8217;s district office, 75 Langley Drive</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Lithonia</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Johnston&#8217;s district office, 5700 Hillandale Dr.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Macon</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Marshall&#8217;s Macon office, 682 Cherry Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Marietta</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Gingrey&#8217;s Marietta office, 219 Roswell Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Newnan</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Westmoreland&#8217;s district office, 1601-B East Highway 34</p>
<p><a href="mailto:Jimric314@gmail.com"><strong>Peachtree City</strong></a> – Saturday, July 18, 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., at the Gathering Place, 203 MacIntosh Trail</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Rome</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. at Rep. Gringrey&#8217;s Rome office, 600 East First Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:devore@mindspring.com"><strong>Roswell</strong></a> – Saturday, Sept. 12, 11:30 a.m.to 1 p.m., Old Historic Square, Hwy 9 and Hwy 120</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Sandersville</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Barrow&#8217;s Sandersville office, city hall, 141 West Haynes Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Savannah</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., 450 Mall Boulevard</p>
<p><a href="mailto:marolynoverton@yahoo.com"><strong>Savannah</strong></a> – Friday, July 31, 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Rousakis Plaza, Historic River Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Thomasville</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Bishop&#8217;s Thomasville office, 137 East Jackson Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Toccoa</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., at Rep. Broun&#8217;s Tocca office, 194 Remsdale Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Tucker</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., Rep. Johnston&#8217;s district office, 3469 Lawrenceville Highway</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Valdosta</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., Rep. Jack Kingston&#8217;s Valdosta office, Valdosta Federal Bilding, 401 N. Patterson St.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:gateapartypatriots@gmail.com"><strong>Vidalia</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m., in front of Rep. Barrow&#8217;s Vidalia office, 107 Old Airport Rd.</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p align="center"><strong>Illinois</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="mailto:teaparty.patriots.central.il@gmail.com">Peoria</a> </strong>– Friday, July 17, 2 p.m. to 5 p.m., Aaorn Shock&#8217;s office at the federal courthouse, 100 Monroe St.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Massachusetts</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:dlrapoza@comcast.net"><strong>New Bedford</strong></a> – Friday, July 17, 3 p.m., outside Rep. Barney Frank&#8217;s office, 558 Pleasant St.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Missouri</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:EurekaTeaParty@charter.net"><strong>Ellisville</strong></a> – Saturday, July 18, 6 p.m. to 9 p.m., Bluebird Park, 225 Kiefer Creek Road</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Montana</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:MontanansUnite@gmail.com"><strong>Great Falls</strong></a> – Saturday, Sept. 12, 1 p.m., Park Drive and Central Avenue</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Nevada</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:rickcrain2000@yahoo.com"><strong>Mesquite</strong></a> – Tuesday, July 14, 12 p.m., Mesquite City Hall</p>
<p align="center"><strong>New Jersey</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:gardnerfam4@hotmail.com"><strong>New Brunswick</strong></a> – Thursday, July 16, 4 p.m., Rutgers University&#8217;s Voorhees Mall between College Ave and George Street</p>
<p align="center"><strong>New York</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:statenislandtaxteaparty@gmail.com"><strong>Staten Island</strong></a> – Saturday, Aug. 2, 12 p.m. to 3 p.m., Conference House Park &#8211; Tottenville</p>
<p align="center"><strong>North Carolina</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:tl862@bellsouth.net"><strong>Goldsboro</strong></a> – Saturday, July 18, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Goldsboro Commons, 200 S. Center Street</p>
<p><a href="mailto:carla_harper@bellsouth.net"><strong>Maydan</strong></a> – Saturday, July 25, 7 p.m., Washington Mills Bridge in Maydan, meet in bridge parking lot</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Ohio</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:wwilliam@insight.rr.com"><strong>Columbus</strong></a> – Saturday, Aug. 1, Ohio statehouse, corner of Broad and High Street</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Texas</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:lchwhiteford@aol.com"><strong>Houston</strong></a> – Saturday, Sept. 12, 10 a.m, Norris Convention Center, I-10 and Beltway 8 Southeast corner</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Virginia</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:teapartypatriots@richmondteaparty.com"><strong>Chesterfield</strong></a> – Saturday, July 25, 1 p.m. to 7 p.m., Chesterfield County Fairgrounds, 10300 Courthouse Rd.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:shenvalleyteaparty@comcast.net"><strong>Staunton</strong></a> – Saturday, Aug. 1, 6 p.m. to 9 p.m., Gypsy Hill Park Bandstand, Thornrose Avenue</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Washington, D.C.</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:darla@grassfire.org"><strong>Washington, D.C.</strong></a> – Thursday, Sept. 10, 8 a.m., Capitol</p>
<p><a href="http://912dc.org/"><strong>Washington, D.C.</strong></a> – Saturday, Sept. 12, march on the capitol</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Wisconsin</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:oolongruby@gmail.com"><strong>New Richmond</strong></a> – Saturday, July 18, 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., New Richmond Heritage Center, 1100 Heritage Drive</p>
<p><em>For more information on these events, or to RSVP, visit the <a href="http://www.teapartypatriots.org/">Tea Party Patriots website</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/07/14/912-mania-massive-tea-party-storms-d-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Narrowly Advances Climate Bill to the Floor</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/26/house-narrowly-advances-climate-bill-to-the-floor/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/26/house-narrowly-advances-climate-bill-to-the-floor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaration of Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trilateral Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Largest tax increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national energy tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revaluation of the dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Democrats narrowly won a key test vote Friday on sweeping legislation to combat global warming and usher in a new era of cleaner energy. Republicans said the bill included "the largest tax increase in American history."

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><span style="font-family: &quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot" lang="EN"><span style="font-size: x-small"><span style="color: #ff0000"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">Fellow Countrymen:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">You have to STOP THIS.  This bill is not only the BIGGEST tax increase in the history of our country, as well as the most business crushing oppressive bill to ever be legislated, it is also the biggest usurpation of our Freedom and rights ever stolen by the U.S. Government.  If you, each one of you, let this happen, it will be your own fault for not acting like responsible adults and ensuring that the Federal Government obey the “Enumerated” Powers that We The People authorized to them.  We did not authorize them to steal our money or our unalienable rights.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red;font-size: 10pt" lang="EN">If this passes, mark my words, there will be no choice but to war, if we ever want our freedom, liberties, rights, earnings and personal property rights back.  So if you want to restore our rights anf freedom peacefully, you have to stop this bill by writing and calling all your U.S. Congressional Representatives.  Please let’s get this done PEACEFULLY.  Total tyranny and oppression under these despots in Congress and the Administration is NOT an option for us or our posterity.   This bill will, without question, push America into a really severe Depression, the likes of which will make the Great Depression look like a cake walk.  Yes this was going to happen anyway, but the Democrats have just pushed the petal to the metal with the car headed right toward the cliff.  The problem with this is, when We The People restore our power, rights and keep our earnings, from any Government, it will take far longer to recover and get the energy harvesting assets out where we need them to produce the energy we will need to pull up our lives from the muck of the “hybrid” of Socialism, Communism and Fascism. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red;font-size: 10pt" lang="EN">I guess there is one good thing about this bill, it will greatly excelerate the collapse of &#8220;<a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/03/america-after-the-collapse-of-the-matrix-and-the-war/">The MATRIX</a>&#8220;. </span><span style="font-family: &quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red;font-size: 10pt" lang="EN"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red;font-size: 10pt" lang="EN">If this bill really passes, we have our mission cut out for us:  <a title="Permanent Link to We are at War with the most Dangerous Enemy That Has EVER Faced Mankind" rel="bookmark" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/05/we-are-at-war-with-the-most-dangerous-enemy-that-has-ever-faced-mankind/"><span style="color: #265e15">We are at War with the most Dangerous Enemy That Has EVER Faced Mankind</span></a> - &#8211; </span><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 10pt" lang="EN">Capt. Karl</span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><em></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><em></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;font-size: 24pt"><span style="color: #000000">Look at this and consider the future</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;font-size: 24pt"><span style="color: #000000">this will bring in:</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;font-size: 24pt"><span style="color: #000000"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;font-size: 24pt"><span style="color: #000000">Do Something Now!</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">House Democrats narrowly won a key test vote Friday on sweeping legislation to combat global warming and usher in a new era of cleaner energy. Republicans said the bill included “the largest tax increase in American history.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">The vote was 217-205 to advance the White House-backed legislation to the floor, and 30 Democrats defected, a reflection of the controversy the bill sparked.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">The legislation would impose limits for the first time on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas pollution from power plants, factories and refineries. It also would force a shift from coal and other fossil fuels to renewable and more efficient forms of energy. Supporters and opponents agreed the result would be higher energy costs, but disagreed widely on the impact on consumers.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">President Obama has made the measure a top priority of his first year in office. The president, along with White House aides and House Democratic leaders, scrambled for the votes to assure passage. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has pledged to get the legislation passed before lawmakers leave on their July 4 vacation.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">The Senate has yet to act on the measure, and a major struggle is expected.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">In the House, the bill’s fate depended on the decisions of a few dozen fence-sitting Democrats, mainly conservatives and moderates from contested districts who feared the political ramifications of siding with the White House and their leadership on the measure.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Democrats left little or nothing to chance. Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif., confirmed by the Senate on Thursday to an administration post, put off her resignation from Congress until after the final vote on the climate change bill.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">“The bill contains provisions to protect consumers, keep costs low, help sensitive industries transition to a clean energy economy and promote domestic emission reduction efforts,” the White House in a statement of support for the legislation.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Republicans saw it differently.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">This “amounts to the largest tax increase in American history under the guise of climate change,” said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">While the bill would impose a “cap-and-trade” system that would force higher energy costs, Republicans for weeks have branded it an energy tax on every American.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">But Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said there was a “moral imperative to be good stewards of the earth.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">The legislation, totaling about 1,200 pages, would require the U.S. to reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent from 2005 levels by 2020 and about 80 percent by the next century.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are rising at about 1 percent a year and are predicted to continue increasing without mandatory caps.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Under the bill, the government would limit heat-trapping pollution from factories, refineries and power plants. It would distribute pollution allowances that could be bought and sold, depending on whether a facility exceeds the cap or makes greater pollution cuts than are required.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Obama on Thursday called it “a vote of historic proportions … that will open the door to a clean energy economy” and green jobs. “It will create millions of new jobs,” Pelosi insisted.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Both Obama and Pelosi preferred to focus on the economic issues rather than on what environmentalists view as the urgency of reducing carbon emissions blamed for global warming.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">The Rust Belt coal-state Democrats who have been sitting on the fence worry about how to explain their vote for higher energy prices to people back home — and how the vote might play out in elections next year.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Republicans have been quick to exploit those concerns.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">“Democratic leaders are poised to march many moderate Democrats over a cliff … by forcing them to vote for a national energy tax that is unpopular throughout the heartland,” Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio said.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">There was widespread agreement that under this cap-and-trade system, the cost of energy would almost certainly increase. But Democrats argued that much of the impact on taxpayers would be offset by other provisions in the bill. Low-income consumers would qualify for credits and rebates to cushion the impact on their energy bills.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Two reports issued this week — one from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and the other from the Environmental Protection Agency — seemed to support that argument.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">The CBO analysis estimated that the bill would cost an average household $175 a year; the EPA put it at between $80 and $110 a year.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #000000">Republicans questioned the validity of the CBO study and noted that even that analysis showed actual energy production costs increasing $770 per household. Industry groups have cited other studies showing much higher cost to the economy and to individuals.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #0000ff">Perhaps you don&#8217;t believe any of the above?  Well perhaps you will believe President Barack Obama telling you that his bill, the Waxman-Markey Climate bill will &#8220;necessarily cause energy prices to SKYROCKET&#8221;.  My God, people, you have the power because you still have a little bit of freedom left; DON&#8217;T Squander it!  STOP THIS BILL flood the telephone banks at the Capitol.  RISE UP and MARCH on Washington D.C. ! ! ! ! ! !  Don&#8217;t you realize your lives are at stake?  What are you going to do when you can&#8217;t afford heat, light or electricity?  If you don&#8217;t care about yourself, how about your children and grandchildren?  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #0000ff">Listen to Barack Obama as he tell us what he has in store for us Americans:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"><span style="color: #0000ff">MY  GOD  PEOPLE,  DO  SOMETHING  - -</span>  We are at war with the most Dangerous Enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars. That enemy are the despotic usurping tyrants in the U.S. Government.  Stand up and be counted BEFORE they take that right away from us too along with being able to afford electricity and heat.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt">Y<span style="color: #0000ff">OU LITERALLY HAVE <span style="text-decoration: underline">NO TIME LEFT !</span>  You must do something RIGHT NOW!  They are about to vote on the Waxman-Markey bill THIS EVENING!</span></p>
<p> Do you really believe the balderdash about Global Warming and/or Climate change?  If so, you need to read all of the Scientific articles and information here&gt; <a title="Permanent Link to Waxman-Markey bill, Voted on Tommorrow, Will Wipe You and Nation Out Financially" rel="bookmark" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/25/2150/"><span style="color: #265e15">Waxman-Markey bill, Voted on Tommorrow, Will Wipe You and Nation Out Financially</span></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p></span></span></span></h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/26/house-narrowly-advances-climate-bill-to-the-floor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waxman-Markey bill, Voted on Tommorrow, Will Wipe You and Nation Out Financially</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/25/2150/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/25/2150/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[produce energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waxman-Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waxman-Markey bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. House of Representatives may vote this Friday on the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009” (the Waxman-Markey bill).  We need the many voices of the Partnership for America’s Energy Security to write and call your legislators, urging them to oppose this harmful and misguided legislation.

Addressing climate change is an important issue, and the U.S. oil and natural gas industry has made substantial commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  The industry supports balanced legislation to reduce greenhouse gases and replace the patchwork of state and federal regulatory programs, but the Waxman-Markey bill is not the answer.  This hastily drafted legislation would:

Significantly increase consumer and business costs for gasoline and other fuels;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=5fac6fb2-c823-487d-80d4-19495eb96c1b&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d156" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #3d979b">Help us prevent a costly energy proposal from becoming law!</span></strong></a></span></p>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">The U.S. House of Representatives may vote <em><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">this Friday</span></strong></em> on the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009” (the Waxman-Markey bill).  We need the many voices of the Partnership for America’s Energy Security to <strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline">write and call</span></em></strong> your legislators, urging them to oppose this harmful and misguided legislation.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Addressing climate change is an important issue, and the U.S. oil and natural gas industry has made substantial commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  The industry supports balanced legislation to reduce greenhouse gases and replace the patchwork of state and federal regulatory programs, but <a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=5e4d6f49-bd89-494f-a326-25cd54f747dd&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d156" target="_blank"><strong><em><span style="color: #3d979b">the Waxman-Markey bill is not the answer</span></em></strong></a>.  This hastily drafted legislation would:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Significantly increase consumer and business costs for gasoline and other fuels;</span></strong></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Hurt American refiners—costing U.S. jobs and impeding our nation’s ability to produce energy domestically;</span></strong></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Discourage domestic development of clean-burning natural gas.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">We ask that you take two immediate actions:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Call your U.S. Representative and urge him or her to vote “NO” on the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act</span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><br />
<em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Just call 877-354-7783 toll free, enter your PIN—10456—listen to the brief instructions, and you will be patched through to your U.S. Representative’s office automatically.</span></em></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Send an email to your U.S. Representative urging him or her to vote “NO” on the Waxman-Markey bill</span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><br />
<a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=b39f7ae9-52f3-42d3-bc3d-cc86c657e5fa&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d156" target="_blank"><em>Visit the Partnership website to send an email</em></a><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">.  It takes just a few minutes to participate.</span></em></span></li>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Our nation needs sensible energy policies that meet economic and environmental needs—without giving advantages to foreign competitors or costing U.S. jobs. Unfortunately, the Waxman-Markey bill will cause new problems without solving our nation’s energy needs.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><strong><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Remember—your voice is a vital part of our nation’s discussion about energy.</span></em></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"> Please take action on this issue today. Thank you.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Sincerely,<br />
Bill Rozett<br />
Executive Director<br />
Partnership for America’s Energy Security</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff">Folks,</span></span></p>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">Michele Marie Bachmann, the Congresswoman from Minnesota, has reported that the <em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="color: #0000ff">Waxman-Markey</span></span></span></strong></em> Cap and trade bill is not only one of the largest tax increases on the American public in history, it is also designed to relinquish much of our very freedoms, liberties and rights.  She stated that this is one of the most important bills to have rejected in our time.  This bill is very scary!</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">The cost to every American man, woman and child, in everything you purchase during a lifetime, in your utility bills and all your bills and to all businesses is NO JOKE.  The bill is so big it wasn&#8217;t even read by any member of Congress, who is supposed to represent you; do you know that?  Congress had made a JOKE of us and this legislation.  These Socialist / Communist / Fascist tyrannical, financially and economically oppressive despots have made a mockery of representing each of one of us and are in the process of not only causing our economy and country to go broke, they don&#8217;t even read the bill, as so many before it, that will cause us to suffer in great hardship.  See how our Congressmen and women make a JOKE out of our lives and their responsibility to represent our interests on this Waxman-Markey bill:</span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j_SB7g_Yb-0&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j_SB7g_Yb-0&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">These are the people who are representing you and your lives. Your financial lives and the economy of our entire country hangs in the balance; Isn&#8217;t it hilarious that they haven&#8217;t even read the bill?  Are you laughing?  I&#8217;m not!  Blood is shooting out of my eyes!  Look at how our Congressmen make a mockery of us and the legislative tyranny and oppression in taxation, enforced by IRS Storm Trooper raids of our homes and businesses that we have to live under for the rest of our lives.</span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt"> They don&#8217;t care about you or your children.  All they care about is their power over you, over your money, over your rights and over your FREEDOM.  You saw it for yourself.  <span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>HOW MUCH LONGER ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE THIS?</strong></span>   RISE-UP PEOPLE!   When are you going to realize that the U.S. Government, all three branches of it, are out to get you, <strong>AND THEY MAKE A &#8220;JOKE&#8221;</strong> and laugh about it AS IT IS GOING DOWN&#8230;  My God people, what are you doing?  The economy hasn&#8217;t even begun to get bad yet&#8230;.  Just wait until the U.S. Government and these U.S. Court Jesters have their way with you.  It is coming people, you can see it for yourself above.  <strong><span style="color: #ff0000">Only you can prevent it.  RISE UP!</span></strong></span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">You must write and call your U.S. Congressmen and you </span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red;font-size: 9pt">MUST PASS THE WORD ALONG TO EVERYONE you know.</span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">  The U.S. Government is up to its old bag of tricks again to obliterate our liberty, freedom and steal our earnings, wealth and private personal property through massive taxes and fees that will be in everything you buy for the rest of your life, your children&#8217;s lives and your grandchildren&#8217;s lives.</span></span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">  It will be in your utility bills.  It will be in your gasoline.  This bill is a true nightmare!  And for what?  31,478 American Scientists have signed a petition that states that there is no substantial evidence to prove in any way, shape, manner or form that Global Warming, if it even exists, is caused by man:</span></span></span></span></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"> </span></span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: #1f497d;font-size: 11pt"> </span><a title="Permanent Link to There Is No Atmospheric Green House Effect" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/24/there-is-no-atmospheric-green-house-effect/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">There Is No Atmospheric Green House Effect</span></a></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/12/23/more-than-650-international-scientists-dissent-over-man-made-global-warming-claims/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Scientists Denounce AP For Hysterical Global Warming Article" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/12/23/scientists-denounce-ap-for-hysterical-global-warming-article/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Scientists Denounce AP For Hysterical Global Warming Article</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><strong><span style="font-size: 14pt">31,478 American Scientists Sign Petition to reject Global Warming</span></strong><span style="font-size: small">: </span></span></span><a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;font-size: small">http://www.petitionproject.org/</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/12/10/sorry-to-ruin-the-fun-but-an-ice-age-cometh/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Very Serious and Important Research on Global Warming by Mankind" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/09/07/very-serious-and-important-research-on-global-warming-by-mankind/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;font-size: small">Very Serious and Important Research on Global Warming by Mankind</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Arctic ice refuses to melt as ordered" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/08/18/arctic-ice-refuses-to-melt-as-ordered/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Arctic ice refuses to melt as ordered</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to MORE GLOBAL COOLING AHEAD, STUDY SAYS" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/07/28/more-global-cooling-ahead-study-says/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">MORE GLOBAL COOLING AHEAD, STUDY SAYS</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Democrats Plan to Maneuver Around GOP on Healthcare and Cap-and-Trade" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/16/democrats-plan-to-maneuver-around-gop-on-healthcare/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Democrats Plan to Maneuver Around GOP on Healthcare and Cap-and-Trade</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Global Warming Cap-and-Trade Will Destroy More of Our Economy" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/05/global-warming-cap-and-trade-will-destroy-more-of-our-economy/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Global Warming Cap-and-Trade Will Destroy More of Our Economy</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: #1f497d;font-size: 11pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Salazar orders BLM to reject bids on 77 Utah leases" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/02/05/salazar-orders-blm-to-reject-bids-on-77-utah-leases/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Salazar orders BLM to reject bids on 77 Utah leases</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Obama Climate Czarina Was Member of Socialist Group’s Environmental Commission" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/01/15/obama-climate-czarina-was-member-of-socialist-groups-environmental-commission/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Obama Climate Czarina Was Member of Socialist Group’s Environmental Commission</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt"><span style="text-decoration: underline">WAKE UP AND DO SOMETHING!</span> </span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">  </span><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="color: #ff0000">YOU ONLY HAVE A FEW HOURS TO ACT!</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">  If you don&#8217;t act, it is your own personal individual fault that this happens; And, you will have NO RIGHT to complain that you are starving or losing your financial future, your way of life and, very well perhaps your home. This bill will push our country over the edge, if YOU do not personally and individually act, NOW&#8230;  The U.S. Government is using this &#8220;emergency&#8221; that doesn&#8217;t even exist, as an excuse to steal our freedom, liberty and money, to control and manipulate each and every one of us and businesses through usurpation, oppression and despotism by way of fear of something that doesn&#8217;t even exist&#8230;   Most of them know Global Warming, caused by mankind, doesn&#8217;t exist, but they are power hungry for your money and your compliance to their will and bidding.  This is a call to arms.    - -<em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"> Capt. Karl</span></em></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/25/2150/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Son of Waxman-Markey: More Politics Makes for a More Costly Bill</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/24/son-of-waxman-markey-more-politics-makes-for-a-more-costly-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/24/son-of-waxman-markey-more-politics-makes-for-a-more-costly-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Waxman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waxman-Markey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representatives Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Ed Markey (D-MA) modified their global warming proposal from the draft version published on March 31. For the most part, the changes focused on the distribution of the allowance revenue--the equivalent of tax revenue.

There was also a slight easing of targeted emissions reductions for 2020, which resulted in a marginally lower economic impact. However, the new distribution of allowances created a less efficient pattern of government expenditures and more than offset the gain from the lower cap for 2020.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="blue">by <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/WilliamBeach.cfm">William W. Beach</a>, <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/DavidKreutzer.cfm">David Kreutzer, Ph.D.</a>, <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/karencampbell.cfm">Karen Campbell, Ph.D.</a> and <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/benlieberman.cfm">Ben Lieberman</a></div>
<div class="green"><em>WebMemo #2450 </em></div>
<div class="CS_Element_Layout">
<table id="idLayout2" class="CS_Layout_Table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr class="CS_Layout_TR">
<td class="CS_Layout_TD">
<div class="CS_Element_Textblock">
<div class="CS_Textblock_Text">
<p>Representatives Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Ed Markey (D-MA) modified their global warming proposal from the draft version published on March 31. For the most part, the changes focused on the distribution of the allowance revenue&#8211;the equivalent of tax revenue.</p>
<p>There was also a slight easing of targeted emissions reductions for 2020, which resulted in a marginally lower economic impact. However, the new distribution of allowances created a less efficient pattern of government expenditures and more than offset the gain from the lower cap for 2020.</p>
<p>The economic impact of the new draft varies from that of the original draft in several major ways:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Compared to no cap and trade, real GDP losses increase an additional $2 trillion, from $7.4 trillion under the original draft to $9.6 trillion under the new draft;</li>
<li>Compared to no cap and trade, average unemployment increases an additional 261,000 jobs, from 844,000 lost jobs under the original draft to 1,105,000 lost jobs under the new draft; and</li>
<li>Peak-year unemployment losses rise by 500,000 jobs, from 2 million under the original draft to 2.5 million under the new draft.</li>
</ul>
<p>Though the proposed legislation would have little impact on world temperatures, it is a massive energy tax in disguise that promises job losses, income cuts, and a sharp left turn toward big government.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this bill would result in government-set caps on energy use that damage the economy and hobble growth&#8211;the very growth that supports investment and innovation. Analysis of the economic impact of Waxman-Markey projects that by 2035 the bill would:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Reduce aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $9.6 trillion;</li>
<li>Destroy 1,105,000 jobs on average, with peak years seeing unemployment rise by over 2,479,000 jobs;</li>
<li>Raise electricity rates 90 percent after adjusting for inflation;</li>
<li>Raise inflation-adjusted gasoline prices by 74 percent;</li>
<li>Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent;</li>
<li>Raise an average family&#8217;s annual energy bill by $1,500; and</li>
<li>Increase inflation-adjusted federal debt by 26 percent, or $29,150 additional federal debt per person, again after adjusting for inflation.</li>
</ul>
<p align="center"><a href="rs=1@CP___PAGEID=324622', '/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart1.gif');"><img style="margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 0px;border: 0px" src="http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart1.gif" border="0" alt="Job Loss" hspace="0" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Waxman-Markey Basics</strong></p>
<p>The bill discloses a basic two-pronged approach to cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The first prong is a set of mandates forcing efficiencies independent of any cost-benefit calculations on the part of industry or consumers. These mandates include a requirement for low-carbon motor fuels and a tenfold increase in the production of electricity from renewable sources.</p>
<p>The second prong is cap and trade. With cap and trade, absolute limits on total emissions of greenhouse gases are established. Before those in a covered sector can emit a greenhouse gas, they need to have the ration coupons (also known as pollution permits or allowances) for each ton emitted. Because the ration coupons will have a value, and therefore a cost, cap and trade becomes a tax on fossil fuels and the energy they generate.</p>
<p>The intent of cap and trade is to impose a cost on CO2 and allow businesses and consumers to adapt as well as they can to this new cost. The mandates of the first parts of Waxman-Markey are counterproductive because they force choices on the economy that might not be the most efficient and inexpensive ways to cut CO2. That said, this paper&#8217;s analysis looks at only the cost of a simple cap-and-trade approach. Consequently, the economic impact estimates reported here will likely be lower than the economic cost of cap and trade hobbled further by mandates.</p>
<p><strong>Baseline Assumptions</strong></p>
<p>To establish a benchmark against which to measure the impact of Waxman-Markey, this paper assumes an economic recovery from the current recession and the subsequent smooth type of economic growth that all major economic forecasts must make. A more rapid economic recovery would make the costs of meeting the CO2 restrictions even greater.</p>
<p><strong>What Is in the Baseline?</strong> The baseline energy projections come from IHS Global Insight&#8217;s latest <em>U.S. Energy Outlook</em>.<a name="_ftnref1" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn1">[1]</a> The highly respected and widely used Global Insight U.S. Macroeconomic model was used to prepare the estimates employed in this paper as well as data from Global Insight&#8217;s November 2008 long-term model, which makes economic forecasts through 2038. Use of the November 2008 macroeconomic model aligned this paper&#8217;s economic forecasting with Global Insight&#8217;s October 2008 energy baseline.<a name="_ftnref2" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn2">[2]</a> The baseline assumptions include:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>A near doubling of light-vehicle fuel efficiency by 2030;</li>
<li>Non-hydro renewable electricity reaching 17 percent by 2030&#8211;a more than fivefold increase; and</li>
<li>36 billion gallons per year of ethanol production, with 20 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol.</li>
</ul>
<p>Though these goals and mandates will be costly to meet (if even they can be met), the costs will occur with or without Waxman-Markey. Therefore, these costs are not counted in this paper&#8217;s economic impacts of the Waxman-Markey bill.</p>
<p><strong>Addressing Offsets.</strong> Waxman-Markey provides emitters with an option to substitute some allowances with certified CO2 reductions by other emitters that are not covered by emissions caps. These offsets can be purchased from domestic or international sources. On the surface, Waxman-Markey&#8217;s treatment of offsets is generous to the point of eliminating constraints on fossil-fuel CO2 for decades. However, closer examination reveals multiple catches, costs, and impossibilities.</p>
<p>For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that domestic offsets simply do not exist anywhere near the magnitude nominally allowed by Waxman-Markey.<a name="_ftnref3" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn3">[3]</a> Driven, perhaps, by the concern that existing offset programs suffer from fraud, Waxman-Markey includes significant hurdles for those wishing to use offsets.<a name="_ftnref4" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn4">[4]</a> The EPA administrator &#8220;may at any time, by rule, remove a project type from the list.&#8221; Further, the administrator shall establish &#8220;policies to assign liability and responsibility for mitigating and fully compensating for reversals.&#8221; That is, using an offset may leave a firm with an open-ended liability. Finally, offsets require 1.25 tons of CO2 reduction for each ton of offset credit.</p>
<p>This analysis assumes that allowances will increase the effective CO2 caps by 15 percent. Recent prices of offsets for the Kyoto program have been between 10 and 15 euros per ton. Given the exchange rate, discount (the 1.25 ton reduction per ton of credit), and likely increase in demand, the initial price of $20 per ton is conservative. After the first five years, this price increases by the expected rate of inflation.</p>
<p><strong>Carbon Capture and Storage.</strong> One hope for those who want to see continued access to U.S. coal reserves is carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. CCS attempts to remove CO2 from the effluent before emission. This captured CO2 would be compressed into liquid form and injected into deep saline aquifers and deep ocean waters or used for enhanced oil recovery.</p>
<p>Serious obstacles to large-scale commercial deployment of CCS have yet to be overcome. CCS requires roughly one-third more energy to generate electricity than processes without CCS. Viable commercial CCS does not yet exist, though the bill does provide funding for three commercial-scale pilot projects. Along with the technological challenges, a massive pipeline system must be created virtually from scratch. But it is the political and environmental obstacles that may prove most daunting. CCS must be proven to be effective in preventing moderate leaks over long periods of time. In addition, community concern with the possibility of catastrophic local release of large quantities of CO2 could provide the ubiquitous not-in-my-backyard opposition that bedevils many waste disposal problems.</p>
<p>This paper&#8217;s analysis of Waxman-Markey assumes that CCS will not be available in significant quantities for the years analyzed.</p>
<p><strong>Renewable Energy Goals.</strong> The renewable energy targets already established by current laws will be challenging to meet. This paper assumes no additional renewable energy beyond these significant baseline increases of 36 billion gallons of renewable motor fuels and the existing state-level renewable electricity requirements. The current baseline projects 18.3 gigawatts of increased nuclear power capacity. The history of nuclear construction in the 1960s through the 1980s shows that a much more aggressive nuclear build-out is technologically possible, but political and other factors make the likelihood of a &#8220;nuclear renaissance&#8221; highly uncertain. Therefore, this study assumes no additional nuclear capacity beyond the baseline increase.</p>
<p><strong>Results of The Heritage Foundation&#8217;s Analysis</strong></p>
<p>It is no surprise that the economy responds to cap and trade as it would to an energy crisis. The price on carbon emissions forces energy cuts across the economy, since non-carbon energy sources cannot replace fossil fuels quickly enough. Energy prices rise; income and employment drop.</p>
<p>The current recession diminishes near-term projections for aggregate economic activity. As this activity drops, so does energy use. Though a recession is bad news, it has the effect of moving the economy closer to the energy cuts needed to meet the emissions targets. Nevertheless, the income (GDP) losses are nearly $200 billion out of the gate and average over $380 billion per year. As the economy recovers and the caps tighten, the detrimental effect of cap and trade gets more and more severe. In the worst years, GDP losses exceed $700 billion per year.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="rs=1@CP___PAGEID=324624', '/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart2.gif');"><img style="margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 0px;border: 0px" src="http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart2.gif" border="0" alt="Change in GDP" hspace="0" /></a></p>
<p>Waxman-Markey will cause higher energy costs to spread throughout the economy as producers everywhere try to cover their higher production costs by raising their product prices. Consumers will be most directly affected by rising energy bills. Even after adjusting for inflation, gasoline prices will rise 74 percent over the 2035 baseline price. Compared to the baseline, residential natural gas consumers will see their inflation-adjusted price rise by 55 percent. Because of its reliance on coal, the cost of electricity will rise by 90 percent&#8211;again after adjusting for inflation and in addition to what the price would have been anyway in 2035.</p>
<p>As President Obama pointed out, cap and trade can work only when energy prices &#8220;skyrocket.&#8221; To force consumer-energy cutbacks, the prices need to rise to painful levels. This paper&#8217;s analysis shows the results of this strategy. By 2035:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The typical family of four will see its direct energy costs rise by over $1,500 per year.</li>
<li>Pain at the electric meter will cause consumers to reduce electricity consumption by 36 percent. Even with this cutback, the electric bill for a family of four will be $754 more that year and $12,200 more in total from 2012 to 2035.</li>
<li>The higher gasoline prices will have forced households to cut consumption by 15 percent, but a family of four will still pay $596 more that year and $7,500 more between 2012 and 2035.</li>
<li>In total, for the years 2012-2035, a family of four will see its direct energy costs rise by $22,800. These inflation-adjusted numbers do not include the indirect energy costs consumers will pay as producers are forced to raise the price of their products to reflect the higher costs of production. Nor does the $22,800 include the higher expenditure for such things as more energy-efficient cars and appliances or the disutility of driving smaller, less safe vehicles or the discomfort of using less heating and cooling.</li>
<li>As the economy adjusts to shrinking GDP and rising energy prices, employment will take a big hit. On average, employment is lower by 1,105,000 jobs. In some years cap and trade reduces employment by nearly 2.5 million jobs.</li>
<li>The negative economic impacts accumulate, and the national debt is no exception: Waxman-Markey will drive up the national debt 29 percent by 2035. This is 26 percent above what it would be without the legislation and represents an additional $29,150 per person, or $116,600 for a family of four. To reiterate, these burdens come after adjusting for inflation and are in addition to the $450,000 per family of federal debt that will accrue over this period even without cap and trade.</li>
</ul>
<p align="center"><a href="rs=1@CP___PAGEID=324626', '/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart3.gif');"><img style="margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 0px;border: 0px" src="http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart3.gif" border="0" alt="Household Share of Debt" hspace="0" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Is It Worth It?</strong></p>
<p>Is all of this economic pain justified by gains against global warming? Waxman-Markey raises energy prices by 55-90 percent. These higher energy prices push unemployment up by 1,105,000 jobs on average, with peaks over 2,479,000. In aggregate, GDP drops by over $9.6 trillion. The next generation will inherit a federal debt pumped up by $29,150 per person. All of these costs accrue in the first 25 years of a 90-year program that, as calculated by climatologists, will lower temperatures by only hundredths of a degree in 2050 and no more than two-tenths of a degree at the end of the century.<a name="_ftnref5" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn5">[5]</a></p>
<p>The impact of Waxman-Markey on the next generation of families is $1,500 per year in higher energy costs, over $100,000 of additional federal debt (above and beyond the unconscionable increases already scheduled), a weaker economy, and more unemployment. Furthermore, the recently proposed modifications to Waxman-Markey only make these problems worse: By devising a less-efficient pattern of government expenditures, this new draft would more than offset the gains from the proposed slight easing of targeted emissions reductions for 2020.</p>
<p>And all for a change in world temperature that might not be noticeable.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/williambeach.cfm" target="_blank">William W. Beach</a> is Director of, <a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/davidkreutzer.cfm" target="_blank">David W. Kreutzer, Ph.D.</a>, is Senior Policy Analyst for Energy Economics and Climate Change in, and <a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/karencampbell.cfm" target="_blank">Karen A. Campbell, Ph.D.</a>, is Policy Analyst in Macroeconomics in the Center for Data Analysis, and <a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/benlieberman.cfm" target="_blank">Ben Lieberman</a> is Senior Policy Analyst in Energy and the Environment in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.</em></p>
<div>
<hr size="1" />
<div id="ftn1">
<p><a name="_ftn1" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref1"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[1]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">IHS Global Insight, <em>U.S.</em> <em>Energy Outlook 2008</em>.</span></div>
<div id="ftn2">
<p><a name="_ftn2" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref2"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[2]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">Though this paper employs the model and data developed by Global Insight, the analysis is the authors&#8217; and should not be interpreted as representing that of IHS Global Insight.</span></div>
<div id="ftn3">
<p><a name="_ftn3" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref3"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[3]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, &#8220;EPA Preliminary Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Discussion Draft,&#8221; April 20, 2009, pp. 3, 14, at <em><a href="http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics/pdfs/WM-Analysis.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics/pdfs<br />
/WM-Analysis.pdf</a></em> (May 8, 2009).</span></div>
<div id="ftn4">
<p><a name="_ftn4" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref4"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[4]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">For discussions about the concerns with the effectiveness of offsets, see Joseph Romm, &#8220;A Good Reason We Shouldn&#8217;t Love Trees, at Least Not in This Case,&#8221; Grist.org, July 2, 2007, at <em><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/the-first-rule-of-carbon-offsets-no-trees" target="_blank">http://www.grist.org/article/the-first<br />
-rule-of-carbon-offsets-no-trees</a></em> (May 8, 2009); Patrick McCully, &#8220;Kyoto&#8217;s Great Carbon Offset Swindle,&#8221; RenewableEnergyWorld.com, June 9, 2008, at <em><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/06/kyotos-great-carbon-offset-swindle-52713" target="_blank">http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/06/kyotos<br />
-great-carbon-offset-swindle-52713</a></em> (May 8, 2009); Michael Wara, &#8220;Is the Global Carbon Market Working?&#8221; <em>Nature</em>, Vol. 445, No. 7128 (February 8, 2007), pp. 595-596, at <em><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7128/abs/445595a.html" target="_blank">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7128<br />
/abs/445595a.html</a></em> (May 16, 2009).</span></div>
<div id="ftn5">
<p><a name="_ftn5" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref5"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[5]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">For instance, see Chip Knappenberger, &#8220;Climate Impacts of Waxman-Markey (the IPCC-based arithmetic of no gain),&#8221; MasterResource, May 6, 2009, at <em><a href="http://masterresource.org/?p=2355" target="_blank">http://masterresource.org/?p=2355</a></em> (May 12, 2009).</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/24/son-of-waxman-markey-more-politics-makes-for-a-more-costly-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost for All American Families for &#8216;Cap and Tax&#8217; Legislation</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/22/cost-for-all-american-families-for-cap-and-trade-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/22/cost-for-all-american-families-for-cap-and-trade-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groceries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Additional cost of family needs products.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/images/fs0027_household.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="340" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div class="green">May 20, 2009</div>
<div class="researchpapertitle"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Waxman-Markey Global Warming Tax Kills More Jobs and Kills the Economy</span></strong></div>
<div class="blue">by heritage.org</div>
<div class="green"><em>Fact Sheet #28 </em></div>
<div class="CS_Element_Layout">
<table id="idLayout2" class="CS_Layout_Table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr class="CS_Layout_TR">
<td class="CS_Layout_TD">
<div class="CS_Element_Textblock">
<div class="CS_Textblock_Text">
<p style="float: left;margin-bottom: 1px;margin-right: 10px"><a href="rs=1@CP___PAGEID=325589', '/Press/FactSheet/images/fs_0028.JPG');"></a></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Cap and Tax Top Ten List</span></strong></p>
<p>1. <strong>Cap and Trade Is a Massive Energy Tax</strong></p>
<p>2. <strong>It Will Not Make a Substantive Impact on the Environment</strong></p>
<p>3. <strong>It Will Kill Jobs</strong></p>
<p>4. <strong>It Will Cause Electricity Bills and Gas Prices to Sharply Increase</strong></p>
<p>5. <strong>It Will Outsource Manufacturing Jobs and Hurt Free Trade</strong></p>
<p>6. <strong>It Will Make You Choose Between Energy, Groceries, Clothing, and Haircuts</strong></p>
<p>7. <strong>It Will Be Highly Susceptible to Fraud and Corruption</strong></p>
<p>8. <strong>It Will Hurt Senior Citizens, the Poor, and the Unemployed the Worst</strong></p>
<p>9. <strong>It Will Cost American Families Over $3,000 a Year</strong></p>
<p>10. <strong>President Obama Admitted &#8220;Electricity Rates Would Necessarily Skyrocket&#8221; Under a Cap-and-Trade Program (January 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Waxman-Markey Bill: Dumb and Dumber</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Waxman-Markey Global Warming Tax:</strong> The cap-and-trade tax proposed by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Edward Markey (D-MA) is disguised as environmental legislation when it would have little impact on global temperatures. In fact, it is a massive energy tax that promises soaring household energy bills, major job losses, income cuts, and a sharp left turn toward big government.
<ul>
<li><strong>And It Keeps Getting Worse:</strong> The original draft of Waxman-Markey was so bad for the economy that moderate Democrats demanded it be changed. The new version, believe it or not, is much worse. Compared to no cap and trade, real GDP losses increase an additional $2 trillion, from $7.4 trillion to $9.6 trillion</li>
<li><strong>And Why Is It Getting Worse?</strong> Attempts to reduce costs to consumers in the current bill do ease some near-term economic pains, but because &#8220;pollution permits&#8221; are handed out as subsidies, debt is driven up, interest rates increase, and businesses significantly reduce the investments that drive the overall economy, resulting in a more costly bill.</li>
<li><strong>Green Jobs Are a Myth; Real Job Losses Are Not:</strong> For every &#8220;green job&#8221; created, others are wiped out. Compared to no cap and trade, average unemployment increases in the new bill an additional 261,000 jobs, from 844,000 lost jobs to 1,105,000 lost jobs in the current version</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Your Family Will Pay:</strong> Waxman-Markey will raise electricity rates 90% after adjusting for inflation, gas prices 74%, natural gas prices 55%, and an average family&#8217;s annual energy bill by at least $1,500.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">And What Do We Get After We Tax the Weather?</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The Ultimate Outsourcing:</strong> India and China have repeatedly said they would not match U.S. environmental goals in order to protect their economies. Cap and trade will merely move manufacturing jobs to China and India.</li>
<li><strong>Environmental Status Quo:</strong> All of the outrageous costs associated with this bill may at best result in 0.2 degree drop in temperature by the end of the century, and most likely even less.</li>
<li><strong>Massive Corruption:</strong> <em>The New York Times</em> reports that cap and trade &#8220;is almost perfectly designed for the buying and selling of political support through the granting of valuable emissions permits to favor specific industries and even specific congressional districts&#8221; (May 20, 2009).</li>
<li><strong>An Alternative That Supports American Taxpayers:</strong> Instead of appeasing a radical environmental agenda, President Obama should give us access to all energy sources, including domestic oil production, nuclear energy, coal, and new renewable fuels. Instead of new taxes, the President should aim to lower gas and electricity prices. When government impediments are lifted, America&#8217;s energy entrepreneurs can develop innovative and market-driven solutions to our energy needs.</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information, please visit: <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/20/the-waxman-markey-global-warming-tax/" target="_blank">http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/20/the-waxman-markey-global-warming-tax/</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://norunnyeggs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/fs_0028.jpg"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/22/cost-for-all-american-families-for-cap-and-trade-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
