<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Liberty Tree Lantern &#187; Natural Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/tag/natural-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com</link>
	<description>America Rise Up! Congress Must Strictly Obey Constitutional Laws, As They "WERE" Intended, To Restore Our Freedom, Economy and Individual Prosperity. Let's Take Our Country Back!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do You Want To Know Why Gasoline Is So High?</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/10/30/do-you-want-to-know-why-gasoline-is-so-high/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/10/30/do-you-want-to-know-why-gasoline-is-so-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=3690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we the people would make the 'decison' to force the Obama Administration to release Oil and Gas drilling leases, WHERE THE OIL and GAS IS, the price of energy would plummet because there are many HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of barrels of crude oil and untold volumes of natural gas in the Western Federal Lands and Offshore.  The US Government IS selling leases all over America and even offshore in areas that they are confidently sure there is no Oil or Gas.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Regulatory Commissars: Oil Off Limits for Thriving Bears</h3>
<p>Believing themselves to be smarter than the average bear, bureaucrats in the Obama administration continue their quest to create a, well, bear market &#8212; at least for oil. The White House decided to designate more than 200,000 square miles of Alaskan land and coastline as &#8220;critical habitat&#8221; for polar bears &#8212; the same bear population that has reached greater numbers than previously recorded in history. In fact, despite what Al Gore and his fellow global warmists would have us believe, the population has actually risen by 40 percent since 1974.</p>
<p>This new non-endangered species habitat is enormous enough to qualify as the third largest state in the union, placing it between Texas and California in terms of square miles. Former UnitedHealth general counsel and now Assistant Interior Secretary Tom Strickland claimed at a news conference that the greatest threat to the bear is Arctic ice melt and that &#8220;we will continue to work to protect the polar bear and its fragile environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, the new designation as a critical habitat is the first step in requiring even more government consideration of the supposed negative effect on the escalating polar bear numbers before allowing oil and gas development. The state of Alaska responded by filing a complaint in an effort to stop the listing under the Endangered Species Act.</p>
<p>In the meantime, some 30 percent of the world&#8217;s gas supplies and 4 percent of the estimated global oil supply will be placed off limits because of this deceitful claim that the polar bear population is endangered. Next up, the loggerhead turtle, which, if listed as endangered, would bring regulations on everything along the eastern seaboard, including what lights you can put on the ocean-facing side of your house.</p>
<h2>Here are some more reasons:</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<h3><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55804">CNSNews.com &#8211; Interior Secretary Wants Probe of Bush <strong>&#8230;</strong></a></h3>
</li>
</ul>
<h4><a href="http://www.nationalforestlawblog.com/apps/blog/show/1896798-obama-administration-blocking-domestic-oil-leases">Obama Administration Blocking Domestic Oil Leases</a></h4>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><img style="width: 16px;height: 16px" src="http://images.freewebs.com/static/global/profile_images/noProfilePic_100x100.gif" alt="" /> Posted by nationalforestlawblog at 09:06 PM on October 08, 2009</td>
<td align="right" valign="middle"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<p><img src="http://www.nationalforestlawblog.com/gas%20well.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Utah &#8211; Contrary to his campaign pronouncements to free the U.S. from foreign oil, the Obama administration is blocking oil leases awarded last year</strong>.  The move would put the land off limit to oil and gas exploration.   You can read these articles from the <em><strong><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13515553">Salt Lake Tribune</a>, <a href="http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/interior_halts_some_utah_leases_oks_others_defers_most/C37/L37/">New West</a> </strong></em>and a couple blurbs from the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125502810592574097.html"><em><strong>Wall Street Journal</strong></em></a> and on <a href="http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2009/10/interior-issues-report-drilling-near-national-parks-utah4714"><em><strong>National Parks Traveler.  </strong></em></a></p>
<p>The bottomline, folks, is that the Obama Administration is PURPOSEFULLY causing electric, heat, gasoline, food and all transportation prices to skyrocket for all Americans &#8211; ON PURPOSE.  If you doubt this writer, would you believe Barack Obama if he told you himself?  Or would you call him a complete liar?  The only question you need to ask yourself is; Is Barack Obama a liar?  If you don&#8217;t think he is a liar that means that you believe him when he says;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>As you can see and hear for yourself, besides <strong>SIGNIFICANTLY</strong> raising the cost of living, for all Americans, by purposely causing the production of oil and gas energy to be slowed way down as highlighted above, he and the US Congress wants to tax the living heck out of it, the cost of such taxes to be passed down to every single American who turns on lights and/or heats their home.  Once Barack Obama and his hand selected &#8220;green&#8221; Socialist / Communists accomplish their &#8220;change&#8221; few of us will be able to afford to live anymore.  How are you doing with your bills and taxes right now?  All of your bills, right down to food and all taxes will be going up DRAMATICALLY over the next year.  And most Socialists and all Tories amongst us thinks that is a very very good thing.  Just ask them.  You should consider yourself lucky if you have any &#8220;change&#8221; left in your pocket in about one year. </p>
<p>If we the people would make the &#8216;decison&#8217; to force the Obama Administration to release Oil and Gas drilling leases, <span style="color: #0000ff">WHERE THE OIL and GAS IS</span>, the price of energy would plummet because there are many HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of barrels of crude oil and untold volumes of natural gas in the Western Federal Lands and Offshore.  The US Government IS selling leases all over America and even offshore in areas that they are confidently sure there is no Oil or Gas. </p>
<p>It is The Liberty Tree Lantern&#8217;s opinion that this sham by the US Government, which is affecting our lives and, combined with this economy and job loss, may even kill some of us this winter, must end.  Letting the Federal Government compel us have to live with icicles hanging from our nostils shouldn&#8217;t be allowed by us &#8211; We The People.   Wake UP, people!  Don&#8217;t let the Federal Government do this to us!  In a &#8220;free&#8221; society, in the end, it is us that borrowed them our authority, we do have the right and the duty to take it back in the face of utter despotism and tyranny.  See: <a href="http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm">The Declaration of Independence</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/10/30/do-you-want-to-know-why-gasoline-is-so-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Benefits from America&#8217;s Industrial Demise?</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/15/who-benefits-from-americas-industrial-demise/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/15/who-benefits-from-americas-industrial-demise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap-n-tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-n-Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=3113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Numerous studies have documented how the grossly misnamed Affordable Energy Act of 2009, also known as Cap and Trade or more accurately Cap and Tax, will raise the cost of energy for every American.  If the cost of all energy rises dramatically, will industrial production stay in this country or will it move to China or India that is not constrained by the cost of energy regulations?  China and India already enjoy a significant cost advantage over American producers in many fields; this will just exacerbate that advantage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>by David Nace</h4>
<p>Like it or not we live in a global economy.  If the Obama administration enacts policies that make it too expensive to manufacture products in the United States, those products will be made in other countries and shipped here.</p>
<p>Numerous studies have documented how the grossly misnamed Affordable Energy Act of 2009, also known as Cap and Trade or more accurately Cap and Tax, will raise the cost of energy for every American.  If the cost of all energy rises dramatically, will industrial production stay in this country or will it move to China or India that is not constrained by the cost of energy regulations?  China and India already enjoy a significant cost advantage over American producers in many fields; this will just exacerbate that advantage.</p>
<p>While the US taxpayers are paying to support the preservation of United Auto Workers jobs, with outlandish pay and benefit costs, at GM and Chrysler, the same administration is willing to drive industrial production overseas.  Perhaps this is why the administration is also supporting Card Check legislation that will allow easy unionization of millions of workers in the service industries.  It knows that its other policies will destroy millions of well paying industrial jobs in this country.  Based upon the Spanish government&#8217;s experiences with subsidizing alternative energy sources through higher conventional energy prices, Cap and Tax will destroy 2 million jobs per year in this country.</p>
<p>For such a damaging plan to be seriously considered there must be a group that benefits from its passage.  Just as Joseph Kennedy benefited handsomely from FDR&#8217;s programs in the 1930&#8217;s, it turns out that some of main benefactors of this program are also politically very well connected.</p>
<p>In 2004, Al Gore, former Vice President and author of Inconvenient Truth, started Generational Investment Management (GIM) to provide funding to businesses associated with alternative energy.   GIM also happens to own 10% of the Chicago Climate Exchange, which will issue the carbon credits that Cap and Tax legislation is based upon.</p>
<p>In 2007, Al Gore became a partner in the venture capital firm of Kleiman, Perkins, Claufield and Byers (KPCB).  This firm is heavily invested in renewable energy and electrical grid improvements.  The market for their products is almost completely dependent on government programs in the form of subsidies, tax breaks or regulation.  Al Gore&#8217;s contribution to KPCB is to promote government intervention into the energy markets.</p>
<p>It is not surprising that venture capital firms and investment firms that will have a stake in the trading of carbon credits, have made extensive campaign contributions to those legislators proposing Cap and Trade legislation.  Clearly, the American public looses in the form of higher energy costs and lost jobs however, a few politically well connected individuals will have much to gain as the result of further government regulation of energy consumption.</p>
<p><em>David Nace is a Liberty Features Syndicated writer.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/15/who-benefits-from-americas-industrial-demise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life Blood of Freedom Found in Gulf And Available Around America</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/07/life-blood-of-freedom-found-in-gulf-and-available-around-america/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/07/life-blood-of-freedom-found-in-gulf-and-available-around-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drill Here]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drill Now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic impact of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasoline cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil leases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=3032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God created all sorts of energy resources, only a few of which have been developed and utilized to drive our economy.  Energy is the life blood of freedom and it is what allows our economy to produce individual wealth for all Americans.  And, this is why energy, in all forms, is so very important to the average working American.  Cheap inexpensive oil is what results in the costs of everything to go down to reasonable affordable levels for us all.  When energy is inexpensive it is also an incentive for Americans to start new small businesses, because then it is easier to make a good profit, and therefore lower energy costs results in hundreds of thousands of new jobs and allows for significant increases in money available for wages on the shop floor or out in the field.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>God created all sorts of energy resources, only a few of which have been developed and utilized to drive our economy.  Energy is the life blood of freedom and it is what allows our economy to produce individual wealth for all Americans.  And, this is why energy, in all forms, is so very important to the average working American.  Cheap inexpensive oil is what results in the costs of everything to go down to reasonable affordable levels for us all.  When energy is inexpensive it is also an incentive for Americans to start new small businesses, because then it is easier to make a good profit, and therefore lower energy costs results in hundreds of thousands of new jobs and allows for significant increases in money available for wages on the shop floor or out in the field.</p>
<p>Energy prices, like prices for everything, are determined by the principles of supply and demand.  The more supply of energy the United States has available to meet the demand of our large and small businesses and individual needs and desires the less it costs.  That is why we the American people have so much power to lower the cost of our energy and make ourselves individually more wealthy.</p>
<p>The fact is that there are HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of barrels of oil and vast volumes of natural gas available DOMESTICALLY right here in and around America.  In addition America has vast resources in coal energy.  Combining the unfathomable quantities of these resources with new developing energy sources would immensely improve all of our families’ economic conditions.  The Liberty Tree Lantern is astonished at how little the mainstream media is reporting all of the new and existing volumes of domestic energy available for us.  We also find it interesting how little it is reported that the Obama Administration is standing in the way of releasing the leases necessary to drill and harvest these vast resources that would so greatly improve our economy and restore the prosperity of individual citizens.</p>
<p>What we need to do as Americans is to get together and with one Tea Party like voice demand that Obama and his Secretary of The Interior release the leases that our Oil companies need to drill for oil out west on federal lands and offshore all around our country and Alaska so that we can build up America and strengthen our freedom through massive infusions of domestic energy.</p>
<p>The Liberty Tree Lantern is happy to provide just one story, of dozens of available, regarding domestic American energy just waiting for the Obama Administration to let us produce the energy we so desperately need to lower our costs of everything.   Please send a personal message to Congress via, paper, e-mail and phone that you want Obama to release the drilling leases immediately.  Tell them to DRILL  HERE AND DRILL NOW!  (Do you know that Obama is stealing American taxpayer money to “give” to Brazil for ‘them’ to drill for oil offshore?  See:  <a title="Permanent Link to U.S. Taxpayers to Provide Financing To Brazil for “Their” Offshore Drilling" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/03/3013/">U.S. Taxpayers to Provide Financing To Brazil for “Their” Offshore Drilling</a>)</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aGOdeaS1rjQ&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aGOdeaS1rjQ&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>When you write or talk to your Congressman, make sure that you mention that the LAST thing we need are taxes on energy that will increase costs on every single thing the American family needs to live and businesses need to create well paying jobs.  Reject Cap-n-TAX in any form, folks, because such taxes will set our entire country back by decades destroy jobs, wealth, savings and create poverty.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Liberty Tree Lantern has a few questions for our readers to ponder: </p>
<ol>
<li>Why, after the people of America demanded that the ban on offshore and western Federal Lands expire, which it did some months ago now, has the Obama Administration withheld exploration leases and not allowed oil companies to go where they know the domestic oil likely is for exploration and harvest? </li>
<li>Why is the Obama Administration keeping America from our own domestic energy instead of depending on and importing energy from other countries?</li>
<li>Why doesn&#8217;t the majority of mainstream media report on the Billions of Barrels of crude oil available in Western Federal Lands and offshore when this energy would obviously improve the lives of so many Americans?</li>
<li>America is in a horrible recession RIGHT NOW that could OBVIOUSLY be greatly remedied by dramatically increasing that availability of our own massive volumes of domestic energy, doesn&#8217;t the Obama Administration care about the average individual American who is out of work and quickly running out of money due to job loss and increased prices on utility bills, gasoline, food and just about everything else?</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/09/07/life-blood-of-freedom-found-in-gulf-and-available-around-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What You Can Do To Lower The Cost of Electricity, Gasoline and Utility Bills and Increase Employment</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/08/26/2742/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/08/26/2742/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drill here drill now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study concluded that new development of energy resources in the OCS and on federal lands could generate $1.7 trillion in new public revenues
A revitalized exploration and production program could add 160,000 jobs to our nation’s damaged economy.
Domestic production will reduce reliance on energy imports and strengthen our nation’s energy security.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=5bb0e2cd-5bc6-4b70-993f-f43dd70b19a6&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d102"></a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<table style="width: 480px;height: 670px" border="0" cellpadding="0" width="480">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Dear Karl:</p>
<p>While we are working hard to help stop damaging policies like the Waxman-Markey climate legislation from being enacted, we also need to push hard to encourage positive solutions, such as increased domestic energy exploration and production.The federal Minerals Management Service (MMS) is now considering a new five-year leasing program that will greatly expand our nation’s access to the resource-rich Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).  It is vital that the MMS hear strong support for moving forward with its plan to open 31 areas for oil and natural gas exploration.  This plan will create thousands of new jobs, reduce our dependence on foreign fuel, and make our nation more energy secure.</p>
<p><strong>The deadline to submit comments to MMS is September 21, so please communicate your support today.  <a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=71b67f00-47ed-4e53-8e38-e8bc427ca886&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d102" target="_blank">Click here to take action now!</a></strong></p>
<p>When you write Congress and MMS, please emphasize the key reasons why it makes sense to develop energy resources on federal lands and offshore:</p>
<ul>
<li>A recent study concluded that new development of energy resources in the OCS and on federal lands could generate $1.7 trillion in new public revenues</li>
<li>A revitalized exploration and production program could add 160,000 jobs to our nation’s damaged economy.</li>
<li>Domestic production will reduce reliance on energy imports and strengthen our nation’s energy security.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=5bb0e2cd-5bc6-4b70-993f-f43dd70b19a6&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d102" target="_blank">Visit the Partnership for America’s Energy Security Action Center to send your letter today.</a>  It’s vital that we add our voices to the public debate at this crucial time.</strong></p>
<p>Your letter will help Congress understand that we need a balanced strategy for addressing our nation’s energy needs:  Renewable energy, nuclear, coal, oil, and natural gas all must be part of planning a secure energy future for our nation.</p>
<p>Thank you for participating in this important action.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Bill Rozett<br />
Executive Director<br />
Partnership for America’s Energy Security</p>
<p> </p>
<p align="center">The Partnership for America’s Energy Security | P.O. Box 93 | Alexandria, VA 22314</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/08/26/2742/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waxman-Markey bill, Voted on Tommorrow, Will Wipe You and Nation Out Financially</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/25/2150/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/25/2150/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corruption and/or Public Mind Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[produce energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waxman-Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waxman-Markey bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. House of Representatives may vote this Friday on the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009” (the Waxman-Markey bill).  We need the many voices of the Partnership for America’s Energy Security to write and call your legislators, urging them to oppose this harmful and misguided legislation.

Addressing climate change is an important issue, and the U.S. oil and natural gas industry has made substantial commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  The industry supports balanced legislation to reduce greenhouse gases and replace the patchwork of state and federal regulatory programs, but the Waxman-Markey bill is not the answer.  This hastily drafted legislation would:

Significantly increase consumer and business costs for gasoline and other fuels;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=5fac6fb2-c823-487d-80d4-19495eb96c1b&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d156" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #3d979b">Help us prevent a costly energy proposal from becoming law!</span></strong></a></span></p>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">The U.S. House of Representatives may vote <em><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">this Friday</span></strong></em> on the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009” (the Waxman-Markey bill).  We need the many voices of the Partnership for America’s Energy Security to <strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline">write and call</span></em></strong> your legislators, urging them to oppose this harmful and misguided legislation.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Addressing climate change is an important issue, and the U.S. oil and natural gas industry has made substantial commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  The industry supports balanced legislation to reduce greenhouse gases and replace the patchwork of state and federal regulatory programs, but <a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=5e4d6f49-bd89-494f-a326-25cd54f747dd&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d156" target="_blank"><strong><em><span style="color: #3d979b">the Waxman-Markey bill is not the answer</span></em></strong></a>.  This hastily drafted legislation would:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Significantly increase consumer and business costs for gasoline and other fuels;</span></strong></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Hurt American refiners—costing U.S. jobs and impeding our nation’s ability to produce energy domestically;</span></strong></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Discourage domestic development of clean-burning natural gas.</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">We ask that you take two immediate actions:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Call your U.S. Representative and urge him or her to vote “NO” on the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act</span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><br />
<em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Just call 877-354-7783 toll free, enter your PIN—10456—listen to the brief instructions, and you will be patched through to your U.S. Representative’s office automatically.</span></em></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Send an email to your U.S. Representative urging him or her to vote “NO” on the Waxman-Markey bill</span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><br />
<a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=b39f7ae9-52f3-42d3-bc3d-cc86c657e5fa&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fautologin.aspx%3fuid=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dletter%26aid%3d156" target="_blank"><em>Visit the Partnership website to send an email</em></a><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">.  It takes just a few minutes to participate.</span></em></span></li>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Our nation needs sensible energy policies that meet economic and environmental needs—without giving advantages to foreign competitors or costing U.S. jobs. Unfortunately, the Waxman-Markey bill will cause new problems without solving our nation’s energy needs.</span></p>
<p style="margin: 10.5pt 3.75pt"><strong><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Remember—your voice is a vital part of our nation’s discussion about energy.</span></em></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"> Please take action on this issue today. Thank you.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt">Sincerely,<br />
Bill Rozett<br />
Executive Director<br />
Partnership for America’s Energy Security</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff">Folks,</span></span></p>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">Michele Marie Bachmann, the Congresswoman from Minnesota, has reported that the <em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="color: #0000ff">Waxman-Markey</span></span></span></strong></em> Cap and trade bill is not only one of the largest tax increases on the American public in history, it is also designed to relinquish much of our very freedoms, liberties and rights.  She stated that this is one of the most important bills to have rejected in our time.  This bill is very scary!</span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">The cost to every American man, woman and child, in everything you purchase during a lifetime, in your utility bills and all your bills and to all businesses is NO JOKE.  The bill is so big it wasn&#8217;t even read by any member of Congress, who is supposed to represent you; do you know that?  Congress had made a JOKE of us and this legislation.  These Socialist / Communist / Fascist tyrannical, financially and economically oppressive despots have made a mockery of representing each of one of us and are in the process of not only causing our economy and country to go broke, they don&#8217;t even read the bill, as so many before it, that will cause us to suffer in great hardship.  See how our Congressmen and women make a JOKE out of our lives and their responsibility to represent our interests on this Waxman-Markey bill:</span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j_SB7g_Yb-0&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j_SB7g_Yb-0&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></span></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">These are the people who are representing you and your lives. Your financial lives and the economy of our entire country hangs in the balance; Isn&#8217;t it hilarious that they haven&#8217;t even read the bill?  Are you laughing?  I&#8217;m not!  Blood is shooting out of my eyes!  Look at how our Congressmen make a mockery of us and the legislative tyranny and oppression in taxation, enforced by IRS Storm Trooper raids of our homes and businesses that we have to live under for the rest of our lives.</span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt"> They don&#8217;t care about you or your children.  All they care about is their power over you, over your money, over your rights and over your FREEDOM.  You saw it for yourself.  <span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>HOW MUCH LONGER ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE THIS?</strong></span>   RISE-UP PEOPLE!   When are you going to realize that the U.S. Government, all three branches of it, are out to get you, <strong>AND THEY MAKE A &#8220;JOKE&#8221;</strong> and laugh about it AS IT IS GOING DOWN&#8230;  My God people, what are you doing?  The economy hasn&#8217;t even begun to get bad yet&#8230;.  Just wait until the U.S. Government and these U.S. Court Jesters have their way with you.  It is coming people, you can see it for yourself above.  <strong><span style="color: #ff0000">Only you can prevent it.  RISE UP!</span></strong></span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">You must write and call your U.S. Congressmen and you </span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red;font-size: 9pt">MUST PASS THE WORD ALONG TO EVERYONE you know.</span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">  The U.S. Government is up to its old bag of tricks again to obliterate our liberty, freedom and steal our earnings, wealth and private personal property through massive taxes and fees that will be in everything you buy for the rest of your life, your children&#8217;s lives and your grandchildren&#8217;s lives.</span></span><span style="font-size: small"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">  It will be in your utility bills.  It will be in your gasoline.  This bill is a true nightmare!  And for what?  31,478 American Scientists have signed a petition that states that there is no substantial evidence to prove in any way, shape, manner or form that Global Warming, if it even exists, is caused by man:</span></span></span></span></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"> </span></span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: #1f497d;font-size: 11pt"> </span><a title="Permanent Link to There Is No Atmospheric Green House Effect" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/24/there-is-no-atmospheric-green-house-effect/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">There Is No Atmospheric Green House Effect</span></a></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/12/23/more-than-650-international-scientists-dissent-over-man-made-global-warming-claims/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Scientists Denounce AP For Hysterical Global Warming Article" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/12/23/scientists-denounce-ap-for-hysterical-global-warming-article/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Scientists Denounce AP For Hysterical Global Warming Article</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><strong><span style="font-size: 14pt">31,478 American Scientists Sign Petition to reject Global Warming</span></strong><span style="font-size: small">: </span></span></span><a href="http://www.petitionproject.org/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;font-size: small">http://www.petitionproject.org/</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/12/10/sorry-to-ruin-the-fun-but-an-ice-age-cometh/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Very Serious and Important Research on Global Warming by Mankind" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/09/07/very-serious-and-important-research-on-global-warming-by-mankind/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;font-size: small">Very Serious and Important Research on Global Warming by Mankind</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Arctic ice refuses to melt as ordered" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/08/18/arctic-ice-refuses-to-melt-as-ordered/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Arctic ice refuses to melt as ordered</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to MORE GLOBAL COOLING AHEAD, STUDY SAYS" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/07/28/more-global-cooling-ahead-study-says/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">MORE GLOBAL COOLING AHEAD, STUDY SAYS</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Democrats Plan to Maneuver Around GOP on Healthcare and Cap-and-Trade" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/16/democrats-plan-to-maneuver-around-gop-on-healthcare/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Democrats Plan to Maneuver Around GOP on Healthcare and Cap-and-Trade</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Global Warming Cap-and-Trade Will Destroy More of Our Economy" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/05/global-warming-cap-and-trade-will-destroy-more-of-our-economy/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Global Warming Cap-and-Trade Will Destroy More of Our Economy</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: #1f497d;font-size: 11pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Salazar orders BLM to reject bids on 77 Utah leases" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/02/05/salazar-orders-blm-to-reject-bids-on-77-utah-leases/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Salazar orders BLM to reject bids on 77 Utah leases</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #000000;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><a title="Permanent Link to Obama Climate Czarina Was Member of Socialist Group’s Environmental Commission" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/01/15/obama-climate-czarina-was-member-of-socialist-groups-environmental-commission/"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;color: #0000ff;font-size: small">Obama Climate Czarina Was Member of Socialist Group’s Environmental Commission</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size: 9pt"><span style="color: #0000ff"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt"><span style="text-decoration: underline">WAKE UP AND DO SOMETHING!</span> </span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">  </span><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: red"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="color: #ff0000">YOU ONLY HAVE A FEW HOURS TO ACT!</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color: blue;font-size: 9pt">  If you don&#8217;t act, it is your own personal individual fault that this happens; And, you will have NO RIGHT to complain that you are starving or losing your financial future, your way of life and, very well perhaps your home. This bill will push our country over the edge, if YOU do not personally and individually act, NOW&#8230;  The U.S. Government is using this &#8220;emergency&#8221; that doesn&#8217;t even exist, as an excuse to steal our freedom, liberty and money, to control and manipulate each and every one of us and businesses through usurpation, oppression and despotism by way of fear of something that doesn&#8217;t even exist&#8230;   Most of them know Global Warming, caused by mankind, doesn&#8217;t exist, but they are power hungry for your money and your compliance to their will and bidding.  This is a call to arms.    - -<em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"> Capt. Karl</span></em></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/06/25/2150/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Son of Waxman-Markey: More Politics Makes for a More Costly Bill</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/24/son-of-waxman-markey-more-politics-makes-for-a-more-costly-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/24/son-of-waxman-markey-more-politics-makes-for-a-more-costly-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession / Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-and-Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Waxman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waxman-Markey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=2030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representatives Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Ed Markey (D-MA) modified their global warming proposal from the draft version published on March 31. For the most part, the changes focused on the distribution of the allowance revenue--the equivalent of tax revenue.

There was also a slight easing of targeted emissions reductions for 2020, which resulted in a marginally lower economic impact. However, the new distribution of allowances created a less efficient pattern of government expenditures and more than offset the gain from the lower cap for 2020.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="blue">by <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/WilliamBeach.cfm">William W. Beach</a>, <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/DavidKreutzer.cfm">David Kreutzer, Ph.D.</a>, <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/karencampbell.cfm">Karen Campbell, Ph.D.</a> and <a class="redHoverColorOnly" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/benlieberman.cfm">Ben Lieberman</a></div>
<div class="green"><em>WebMemo #2450 </em></div>
<div class="CS_Element_Layout">
<table id="idLayout2" class="CS_Layout_Table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr class="CS_Layout_TR">
<td class="CS_Layout_TD">
<div class="CS_Element_Textblock">
<div class="CS_Textblock_Text">
<p>Representatives Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Ed Markey (D-MA) modified their global warming proposal from the draft version published on March 31. For the most part, the changes focused on the distribution of the allowance revenue&#8211;the equivalent of tax revenue.</p>
<p>There was also a slight easing of targeted emissions reductions for 2020, which resulted in a marginally lower economic impact. However, the new distribution of allowances created a less efficient pattern of government expenditures and more than offset the gain from the lower cap for 2020.</p>
<p>The economic impact of the new draft varies from that of the original draft in several major ways:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Compared to no cap and trade, real GDP losses increase an additional $2 trillion, from $7.4 trillion under the original draft to $9.6 trillion under the new draft;</li>
<li>Compared to no cap and trade, average unemployment increases an additional 261,000 jobs, from 844,000 lost jobs under the original draft to 1,105,000 lost jobs under the new draft; and</li>
<li>Peak-year unemployment losses rise by 500,000 jobs, from 2 million under the original draft to 2.5 million under the new draft.</li>
</ul>
<p>Though the proposed legislation would have little impact on world temperatures, it is a massive energy tax in disguise that promises job losses, income cuts, and a sharp left turn toward big government.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this bill would result in government-set caps on energy use that damage the economy and hobble growth&#8211;the very growth that supports investment and innovation. Analysis of the economic impact of Waxman-Markey projects that by 2035 the bill would:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Reduce aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $9.6 trillion;</li>
<li>Destroy 1,105,000 jobs on average, with peak years seeing unemployment rise by over 2,479,000 jobs;</li>
<li>Raise electricity rates 90 percent after adjusting for inflation;</li>
<li>Raise inflation-adjusted gasoline prices by 74 percent;</li>
<li>Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent;</li>
<li>Raise an average family&#8217;s annual energy bill by $1,500; and</li>
<li>Increase inflation-adjusted federal debt by 26 percent, or $29,150 additional federal debt per person, again after adjusting for inflation.</li>
</ul>
<p align="center"><a href="rs=1@CP___PAGEID=324622', '/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart1.gif');"><img style="margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 0px;border: 0px" src="http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart1.gif" border="0" alt="Job Loss" hspace="0" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Waxman-Markey Basics</strong></p>
<p>The bill discloses a basic two-pronged approach to cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The first prong is a set of mandates forcing efficiencies independent of any cost-benefit calculations on the part of industry or consumers. These mandates include a requirement for low-carbon motor fuels and a tenfold increase in the production of electricity from renewable sources.</p>
<p>The second prong is cap and trade. With cap and trade, absolute limits on total emissions of greenhouse gases are established. Before those in a covered sector can emit a greenhouse gas, they need to have the ration coupons (also known as pollution permits or allowances) for each ton emitted. Because the ration coupons will have a value, and therefore a cost, cap and trade becomes a tax on fossil fuels and the energy they generate.</p>
<p>The intent of cap and trade is to impose a cost on CO2 and allow businesses and consumers to adapt as well as they can to this new cost. The mandates of the first parts of Waxman-Markey are counterproductive because they force choices on the economy that might not be the most efficient and inexpensive ways to cut CO2. That said, this paper&#8217;s analysis looks at only the cost of a simple cap-and-trade approach. Consequently, the economic impact estimates reported here will likely be lower than the economic cost of cap and trade hobbled further by mandates.</p>
<p><strong>Baseline Assumptions</strong></p>
<p>To establish a benchmark against which to measure the impact of Waxman-Markey, this paper assumes an economic recovery from the current recession and the subsequent smooth type of economic growth that all major economic forecasts must make. A more rapid economic recovery would make the costs of meeting the CO2 restrictions even greater.</p>
<p><strong>What Is in the Baseline?</strong> The baseline energy projections come from IHS Global Insight&#8217;s latest <em>U.S. Energy Outlook</em>.<a name="_ftnref1" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn1">[1]</a> The highly respected and widely used Global Insight U.S. Macroeconomic model was used to prepare the estimates employed in this paper as well as data from Global Insight&#8217;s November 2008 long-term model, which makes economic forecasts through 2038. Use of the November 2008 macroeconomic model aligned this paper&#8217;s economic forecasting with Global Insight&#8217;s October 2008 energy baseline.<a name="_ftnref2" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn2">[2]</a> The baseline assumptions include:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>A near doubling of light-vehicle fuel efficiency by 2030;</li>
<li>Non-hydro renewable electricity reaching 17 percent by 2030&#8211;a more than fivefold increase; and</li>
<li>36 billion gallons per year of ethanol production, with 20 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol.</li>
</ul>
<p>Though these goals and mandates will be costly to meet (if even they can be met), the costs will occur with or without Waxman-Markey. Therefore, these costs are not counted in this paper&#8217;s economic impacts of the Waxman-Markey bill.</p>
<p><strong>Addressing Offsets.</strong> Waxman-Markey provides emitters with an option to substitute some allowances with certified CO2 reductions by other emitters that are not covered by emissions caps. These offsets can be purchased from domestic or international sources. On the surface, Waxman-Markey&#8217;s treatment of offsets is generous to the point of eliminating constraints on fossil-fuel CO2 for decades. However, closer examination reveals multiple catches, costs, and impossibilities.</p>
<p>For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that domestic offsets simply do not exist anywhere near the magnitude nominally allowed by Waxman-Markey.<a name="_ftnref3" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn3">[3]</a> Driven, perhaps, by the concern that existing offset programs suffer from fraud, Waxman-Markey includes significant hurdles for those wishing to use offsets.<a name="_ftnref4" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn4">[4]</a> The EPA administrator &#8220;may at any time, by rule, remove a project type from the list.&#8221; Further, the administrator shall establish &#8220;policies to assign liability and responsibility for mitigating and fully compensating for reversals.&#8221; That is, using an offset may leave a firm with an open-ended liability. Finally, offsets require 1.25 tons of CO2 reduction for each ton of offset credit.</p>
<p>This analysis assumes that allowances will increase the effective CO2 caps by 15 percent. Recent prices of offsets for the Kyoto program have been between 10 and 15 euros per ton. Given the exchange rate, discount (the 1.25 ton reduction per ton of credit), and likely increase in demand, the initial price of $20 per ton is conservative. After the first five years, this price increases by the expected rate of inflation.</p>
<p><strong>Carbon Capture and Storage.</strong> One hope for those who want to see continued access to U.S. coal reserves is carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. CCS attempts to remove CO2 from the effluent before emission. This captured CO2 would be compressed into liquid form and injected into deep saline aquifers and deep ocean waters or used for enhanced oil recovery.</p>
<p>Serious obstacles to large-scale commercial deployment of CCS have yet to be overcome. CCS requires roughly one-third more energy to generate electricity than processes without CCS. Viable commercial CCS does not yet exist, though the bill does provide funding for three commercial-scale pilot projects. Along with the technological challenges, a massive pipeline system must be created virtually from scratch. But it is the political and environmental obstacles that may prove most daunting. CCS must be proven to be effective in preventing moderate leaks over long periods of time. In addition, community concern with the possibility of catastrophic local release of large quantities of CO2 could provide the ubiquitous not-in-my-backyard opposition that bedevils many waste disposal problems.</p>
<p>This paper&#8217;s analysis of Waxman-Markey assumes that CCS will not be available in significant quantities for the years analyzed.</p>
<p><strong>Renewable Energy Goals.</strong> The renewable energy targets already established by current laws will be challenging to meet. This paper assumes no additional renewable energy beyond these significant baseline increases of 36 billion gallons of renewable motor fuels and the existing state-level renewable electricity requirements. The current baseline projects 18.3 gigawatts of increased nuclear power capacity. The history of nuclear construction in the 1960s through the 1980s shows that a much more aggressive nuclear build-out is technologically possible, but political and other factors make the likelihood of a &#8220;nuclear renaissance&#8221; highly uncertain. Therefore, this study assumes no additional nuclear capacity beyond the baseline increase.</p>
<p><strong>Results of The Heritage Foundation&#8217;s Analysis</strong></p>
<p>It is no surprise that the economy responds to cap and trade as it would to an energy crisis. The price on carbon emissions forces energy cuts across the economy, since non-carbon energy sources cannot replace fossil fuels quickly enough. Energy prices rise; income and employment drop.</p>
<p>The current recession diminishes near-term projections for aggregate economic activity. As this activity drops, so does energy use. Though a recession is bad news, it has the effect of moving the economy closer to the energy cuts needed to meet the emissions targets. Nevertheless, the income (GDP) losses are nearly $200 billion out of the gate and average over $380 billion per year. As the economy recovers and the caps tighten, the detrimental effect of cap and trade gets more and more severe. In the worst years, GDP losses exceed $700 billion per year.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="rs=1@CP___PAGEID=324624', '/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart2.gif');"><img style="margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 0px;border: 0px" src="http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart2.gif" border="0" alt="Change in GDP" hspace="0" /></a></p>
<p>Waxman-Markey will cause higher energy costs to spread throughout the economy as producers everywhere try to cover their higher production costs by raising their product prices. Consumers will be most directly affected by rising energy bills. Even after adjusting for inflation, gasoline prices will rise 74 percent over the 2035 baseline price. Compared to the baseline, residential natural gas consumers will see their inflation-adjusted price rise by 55 percent. Because of its reliance on coal, the cost of electricity will rise by 90 percent&#8211;again after adjusting for inflation and in addition to what the price would have been anyway in 2035.</p>
<p>As President Obama pointed out, cap and trade can work only when energy prices &#8220;skyrocket.&#8221; To force consumer-energy cutbacks, the prices need to rise to painful levels. This paper&#8217;s analysis shows the results of this strategy. By 2035:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The typical family of four will see its direct energy costs rise by over $1,500 per year.</li>
<li>Pain at the electric meter will cause consumers to reduce electricity consumption by 36 percent. Even with this cutback, the electric bill for a family of four will be $754 more that year and $12,200 more in total from 2012 to 2035.</li>
<li>The higher gasoline prices will have forced households to cut consumption by 15 percent, but a family of four will still pay $596 more that year and $7,500 more between 2012 and 2035.</li>
<li>In total, for the years 2012-2035, a family of four will see its direct energy costs rise by $22,800. These inflation-adjusted numbers do not include the indirect energy costs consumers will pay as producers are forced to raise the price of their products to reflect the higher costs of production. Nor does the $22,800 include the higher expenditure for such things as more energy-efficient cars and appliances or the disutility of driving smaller, less safe vehicles or the discomfort of using less heating and cooling.</li>
<li>As the economy adjusts to shrinking GDP and rising energy prices, employment will take a big hit. On average, employment is lower by 1,105,000 jobs. In some years cap and trade reduces employment by nearly 2.5 million jobs.</li>
<li>The negative economic impacts accumulate, and the national debt is no exception: Waxman-Markey will drive up the national debt 29 percent by 2035. This is 26 percent above what it would be without the legislation and represents an additional $29,150 per person, or $116,600 for a family of four. To reiterate, these burdens come after adjusting for inflation and are in addition to the $450,000 per family of federal debt that will accrue over this period even without cap and trade.</li>
</ul>
<p align="center"><a href="rs=1@CP___PAGEID=324626', '/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart3.gif');"><img style="margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 0px;border: 0px" src="http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/images/wm2450_chart3.gif" border="0" alt="Household Share of Debt" hspace="0" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Is It Worth It?</strong></p>
<p>Is all of this economic pain justified by gains against global warming? Waxman-Markey raises energy prices by 55-90 percent. These higher energy prices push unemployment up by 1,105,000 jobs on average, with peaks over 2,479,000. In aggregate, GDP drops by over $9.6 trillion. The next generation will inherit a federal debt pumped up by $29,150 per person. All of these costs accrue in the first 25 years of a 90-year program that, as calculated by climatologists, will lower temperatures by only hundredths of a degree in 2050 and no more than two-tenths of a degree at the end of the century.<a name="_ftnref5" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftn5">[5]</a></p>
<p>The impact of Waxman-Markey on the next generation of families is $1,500 per year in higher energy costs, over $100,000 of additional federal debt (above and beyond the unconscionable increases already scheduled), a weaker economy, and more unemployment. Furthermore, the recently proposed modifications to Waxman-Markey only make these problems worse: By devising a less-efficient pattern of government expenditures, this new draft would more than offset the gains from the proposed slight easing of targeted emissions reductions for 2020.</p>
<p>And all for a change in world temperature that might not be noticeable.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/williambeach.cfm" target="_blank">William W. Beach</a> is Director of, <a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/davidkreutzer.cfm" target="_blank">David W. Kreutzer, Ph.D.</a>, is Senior Policy Analyst for Energy Economics and Climate Change in, and <a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/karencampbell.cfm" target="_blank">Karen A. Campbell, Ph.D.</a>, is Policy Analyst in Macroeconomics in the Center for Data Analysis, and <a href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/about/staff/benlieberman.cfm" target="_blank">Ben Lieberman</a> is Senior Policy Analyst in Energy and the Environment in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.</em></p>
<div>
<hr size="1" />
<div id="ftn1">
<p><a name="_ftn1" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref1"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[1]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">IHS Global Insight, <em>U.S.</em> <em>Energy Outlook 2008</em>.</span></div>
<div id="ftn2">
<p><a name="_ftn2" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref2"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[2]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">Though this paper employs the model and data developed by Global Insight, the analysis is the authors&#8217; and should not be interpreted as representing that of IHS Global Insight.</span></div>
<div id="ftn3">
<p><a name="_ftn3" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref3"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[3]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, &#8220;EPA Preliminary Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Discussion Draft,&#8221; April 20, 2009, pp. 3, 14, at <em><a href="http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics/pdfs/WM-Analysis.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics/pdfs<br />
/WM-Analysis.pdf</a></em> (May 8, 2009).</span></div>
<div id="ftn4">
<p><a name="_ftn4" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref4"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[4]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">For discussions about the concerns with the effectiveness of offsets, see Joseph Romm, &#8220;A Good Reason We Shouldn&#8217;t Love Trees, at Least Not in This Case,&#8221; Grist.org, July 2, 2007, at <em><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/the-first-rule-of-carbon-offsets-no-trees" target="_blank">http://www.grist.org/article/the-first<br />
-rule-of-carbon-offsets-no-trees</a></em> (May 8, 2009); Patrick McCully, &#8220;Kyoto&#8217;s Great Carbon Offset Swindle,&#8221; RenewableEnergyWorld.com, June 9, 2008, at <em><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/06/kyotos-great-carbon-offset-swindle-52713" target="_blank">http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/06/kyotos<br />
-great-carbon-offset-swindle-52713</a></em> (May 8, 2009); Michael Wara, &#8220;Is the Global Carbon Market Working?&#8221; <em>Nature</em>, Vol. 445, No. 7128 (February 8, 2007), pp. 595-596, at <em><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7128/abs/445595a.html" target="_blank">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7128<br />
/abs/445595a.html</a></em> (May 16, 2009).</span></div>
<div id="ftn5">
<p><a name="_ftn5" href="http://captkarl.blogivists.com/wp-admin/#_ftnref5"><span style="font-size: xx-small">[5]</span></a><span style="font-size: xx-small">For instance, see Chip Knappenberger, &#8220;Climate Impacts of Waxman-Markey (the IPCC-based arithmetic of no gain),&#8221; MasterResource, May 6, 2009, at <em><a href="http://masterresource.org/?p=2355" target="_blank">http://masterresource.org/?p=2355</a></em> (May 12, 2009).</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/05/24/son-of-waxman-markey-more-politics-makes-for-a-more-costly-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OBAMA ADMINISTRATION PROPOSES ENORMOUS TAX HIKE ON OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY:</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/18/1375/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/18/1375/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshtigo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gasoline prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=1375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last month, President Obama sent an outline of his 2010 budget to Congress, and it contained a dire threat to our nation’s economy and energy security.  The Administration is proposing at least $400 billion in new taxes and fees on the oil and natural gas industry, which would result in:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="width: 6.25in;border: #666666 1.5pt solid" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 15pt;border: #666666;padding: 0in" width="20">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">  </span></span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 225pt;border: #666666;padding: 0in" width="300" valign="top">
<h1 style="margin: 0in 1.5pt 0pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span></h1>
<h1 style="margin: 0in 1.5pt 0pt"><span style="text-decoration: underline"><span style="font-size: 12pt;color: #990000;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=717287e2-f6f1-419a-ad50-4a70605ea66b&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fletter.aspx%3fAlertID%3d116%26UserID%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef" target="_blank"><span style="color: #900000;text-decoration: none">ACTION NEEDED</span></a></span></span></h1>
<p style="margin: 3.75pt 1.5pt">
<div style="margin: 3.75pt 1.5pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Late last month, President Obama sent an outline of his 2010 budget to Congress, and it contained a dire</span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="width: 2.5in" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="240">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: #333333 1pt solid;padding: 0in">
<p style="margin: 8.25pt 11.25pt 7.5pt"><strong><span style="color: white;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=0732d49d-1287-4f5c-85f5-ade3a11ad71e&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2ftell-friend.aspx%3fUserID%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef" target="_blank"><span style="color: white"><span style="font-size: small">70,000 MEMBERS AND <span style="color: #000080">GROWING</span></span></span></a></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 11.25pt 11.25pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="color: #000080">The Partnership for America’s Energy Security has more than 70,000 members.  But we need your help to strengthen our organization in 2009.  Please ask your friends, family, and co-workers to join the Partnership and help us turn back policy proposals that would cost jobs, increase fuel prices, and decrease our energy security.</span></span></p>
<div style="margin-left: 7.5pt;margin-right: 7.5pt;border: #cccccc 1.5pt solid;padding: 6pt">
<p style="margin: 7.5pt 0in;text-align: center;padding: 0in" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=0732d49d-1287-4f5c-85f5-ade3a11ad71e&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2ftell-friend.aspx%3fUserID%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080">Click Here to Get Started.</span></a></span></strong></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 3.75pt">
<td style="height: 3.75pt;border: #f0f0f0;padding: 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><span style="color: #000080">  </span></span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: #333333 1pt solid;padding: 0in">
<p style="margin: 8.25pt 11.25pt 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="color: #000080"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">ENERGY TOWN HALL</span></strong></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"><span style="color: #000080"> </span></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 11.25pt 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;color: white;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=d85fbf4f-521a-476c-8c03-d46331c2c7a6&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.org%2fautologin.aspx%3fid%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dtownhall" target="_blank"><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;text-decoration"><span style="color: #000080">HOW WILL TAX INCREASES ON THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY IMPACT CONSUMERS?</span></span></em></a></span></p>
<p style="margin: 7.5pt 11.25pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="color: #000080">“The Obama Administration has proposed $400 billion in new fees and taxes on the oil and gas industry.  What will be the impact on consumers?”<br />
—<em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Sarah, Manassas, VA</span></em></span></span></p>
<div style="margin-left: 7.5pt;margin-right: 7.5pt;border: #cccccc 1.5pt solid;padding: 6pt">
<p style="margin: 7.5pt 0in;text-align: center;padding: 0in" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=d85fbf4f-521a-476c-8c03-d46331c2c7a6&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.org%2fautologin.aspx%3fid%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef%26page%3dtownhall" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080">Click Here for the Answer.</span></a></span></strong></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: #f0f0f0;padding: 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><span style="color: #000080">  </span></span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: #333333 1pt solid;padding: 0in">
<p style="margin: 8.25pt 11.25pt 7.5pt"><strong><span style="color: white;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=4181d320-25d2-4c16-b238-dbd18a7b7c75&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.apitechtour.org%2fvideo_3.php" target="_blank"><span style="color: white"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="color: #000080">VIDEO: TECHNOLOGY HELPS FIND NATURAL RESOURCES</span></span></span></a></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 11.25pt 11.25pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;color: white;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=4181d320-25d2-4c16-b238-dbd18a7b7c75&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.apitechtour.org%2fvideo_3.php" target="_blank"><span style="color: #000080">Check out this short video</span></a><span style="color: #000080"> on how 3-D visualization technology is helping the oil and natural gas industry find new resources and limit the environmental impact of exploration.</span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>threat to our nation’s economy and energy security.  The Administration is proposing at least $400 billion in new taxes and fees on the oil and natural gas industry, which would result in:</p>
<p></span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="margin: auto auto auto 1.5pt;width: 225pt" border="1" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" width="300">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding-right: 3.75pt;padding-left: 3.75pt;padding-bottom: 0in;padding-top: 0in" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">•</span></span></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 2.25pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">American Job Losses</span></strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">—271,000 estimated American oil and natural gas jobs would be lost annually.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-right: 3.75pt;padding-left: 3.75pt;padding-bottom: 0in;padding-top: 0in" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">•</span></span></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 2.25pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Higher Prices</span></strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">—Historically, higher taxes have resulted in less supply and higher energy costs for consumers, and in today’s economy, that could stifle our recovery.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-right: 3.75pt;padding-left: 3.75pt;padding-bottom: 0in;padding-top: 0in" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">•</span></span></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 2.25pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Greater Dependence on Imports</span></strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">—New taxes and fees on American oil and natural gas companies would hurt domestic energy exploration and development programs and <strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">increase our dependence</span></strong> on foreign oil and natural gas.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="margin: 3.75pt 1.5pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Raising taxes in a time of economic decline is a recipe for disaster.  Public policy should spur job growth, not hurt businesses and consumers.</span></p>
<h1 style="margin: 7.5pt 1.5pt 0pt"><span style="font-size: 12pt;color: #6d7227;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">WHAT YOU CAN DO</span></h1>
<p style="margin: 3.75pt 1.5pt"><strong><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;color: #333333;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Take Action Today!</span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 3.75pt 1.5pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Thank you to all of the Partnership members who have already contacted their legislators about this important issue.  If you haven’t had a chance to take action, there is still time!</span></p>
<p style="margin: 3.75pt 15pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=6b916ad4-9bb5-47d3-b26e-0d6f0e91fbdd&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fletter.aspx%3fAlertID%3d116%26UserID%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">Let your Members of Congress know that you oppose tax and fee hikes on the oil and natural gas industry.</span></a></span></p>
<p style="margin: 3.75pt 1.5pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Please take the following two actions:</span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="margin: auto auto auto 1.5pt;width: 225pt" border="1" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="0" width="300">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 2.25pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Email Your Legislators</span></strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><br />
<a href="http://t.democracydirect.com/?ti_dn__=972b9559-6331-4e6e-8430-7ee1f2a85858&amp;__u_idz=314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef&amp;__turl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.partnershipforenergy.com%2fletter.aspx%3fAlertID%3d116%26UserID%3d314c7c5a-7b2e-4bc4-8c36-72e86f9e8aef" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff">Click here</span></a> to go to the Partnership Action Center and email your Members of Congress, telling them to oppose tax and fee hikes on the oil and natural gas industry.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 2.25pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Call Your Legislators Using Our Toll-Free Hotline</span></strong><span style="font-size: 9pt;color: black;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><br />
Dial 877-354-7783.  Follow the instructions and enter your PIN when prompted.  <strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Your PIN is: 10456</span></strong>.  You will be automatically patched through to the offices of your Members of Congress, and you can share your message.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="margin: 3.75pt 1.5pt"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">It’s critical that we add our voices </span></strong></em><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><br />
<em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">to the debate—before it’s too late!</span></em></span></em></strong></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;text-align: center">
<hr size="1" noshade="noshade" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/18/1375/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Price of Gasoline, Diesel and Energy Going Up</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/10/price-of-gasoline-diesel-and-energy-going-up/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/10/price-of-gasoline-diesel-and-energy-going-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaration of Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The consumer cost of gasoline, diesel and all energy products, which will also increase costs on ALL GOODS and services, including groceries and clothing and all other products of need and sustenance, are going up and have been going up for about a month now despite growing supplies of crude around the world.

Now that begs the question why?  There are VLCCs (Very Large Crude Carriers = Super Tankers) at anchor around the world storing billions of barrels of crude.  Crude oil land storage facilities around the world are bulging at the seams with crude.  So why are the prices on energy going up?

The reason is because the American people have stopped DEMANDING that the U.S. Congress and the Administration allow leases for drilling and exploration to go ahead out west, like in Utah, or offshore.  Secretary of the Interior Salazar has stopped leases.  It takes almost a decade for new sources of oil and natural gas to be found, harvested and structures created to be brought to market.  This means that the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS, perhaps even a Trillion barrels of oil and gas 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The consumer cost of gasoline, diesel and all energy products, which will also increase costs on ALL GOODS and services, including groceries and clothing and all other products of need and sustenance, are going up and have been going up for about a month now despite growing supplies of crude around the world.</p>
<p>Now that begs the question why?  There are VLCCs (Very Large Crude Carriers = Super Tankers) at anchor around the world storing billions of barrels of crude.  Crude oil land storage facilities around the world are bulging at the seams with crude.  So why are the prices on energy going up?</p>
<p>The reason is because the American people have stopped DEMANDING that the U.S. Congress and the Administration allow leases for drilling and exploration to go ahead out west, like in Utah, or offshore.  Secretary of the Interior Salazar has stopped leases.  It takes almost a decade for new sources of oil and natural gas to be found, harvested and structures created to be brought to market.  This means that the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of barrels of oil and massive volumes of natural gas will not be available for mankind after the collapse of &#8220;The Matrix&#8221; and the combination Civil / Re-Revolutionary War in 100% support and enforced compliance of every single word and original intent of The Constitution by the U.S. Government, when these resources will be sorely needed due to the massive ensuing growth of the U.S. economy and individual wealth from the rebirth of &#8220;true&#8221; freedom in victory over the dark forces of Socialism / Communism and Global Fascism being planned for us by The Federal Reserve company&#8217;s private exclusive club of megalomaniacs called <a href="http://www.trilateral.org">The Trilateral Commission</a>. </p>
<p>The increased costs, resultant from individual Americans asleep at the switch and not compelling our Government to proceed to develop our own God given domestic energy resources will cause more cash reversals for all American families resulting in additional usurpation of the power of individual &#8220;free&#8221; American people by our enemies and despots of all branches of the U.S. Government who are trying to rob us of money, power and liberty all the while trying to convince us with puppy dog eyes that they are trying to help us.</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #800000">The U.S. Government breaks our financial legs, gives us a Socialist / Communist crutch of dependency, and then has the gull to state; &#8220;See, without us you wouldn&#8217;t even be able to walk&#8221;.</span></em></p>
<p>People who are not &#8220;in the know&#8221; think that the reason for the price of crude to go down to as low as $35.00 per barrel is solely the result of the international economy.  While that does have an impact on the price of crude, the fact is that when the American public screamed and demanded the U.S. Congress open our lands out west and offshore to exploration and drilling, where there are HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of barrels of God given energy just waiting for our use and economic growth, and Congress blinked and let the ban on exploration to expire, <strong>THIS IS WHAT CAUSED THE PRICE OF CRUDE</strong>, gasoline, diesel, clothing, milk, groceries and other products <strong>TO GO DOWN</strong> to an affordable level.  But now Mr. Ken Salazar is not allowing the leases to go forward to the oil companies to develop the energy we will need in the future.  Without these future resources heat, light and electricity for our homes will be too expensive for us to bear.  The markets price product on expectations of the future.  This purposeful <span style="color: #000000">obliteration of our own domestic future energy resources is causing these prices to increase again, even after our successful battle with the U.S. Congress to Drill, Baby, Drill!  These usurpers and tyrants are now going behind our backs and effectively rescinding our orders.  We must INDIVIDUALLY get back on the phone, mail and e-mail to force our bastard &#8220;servants&#8221;  to obey our will before they completely destroy us and our economy through massive gasoline costs at the pump, on our utility and grocery bills, <strong>AGAIN</strong>!</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The so called &#8220;new&#8221; technologies are going to be far too expensive to be economically viable for at least five decades minimum.  To force these costs down the throats of economically devastated Americans is patently immoral!  But, perhaps this is a good thing!  This will help the Americans who see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil about the U.S. Government to wake up in THE COLD.  This is a very good thing because starvation and freezing helps stimulate the minds of foolish men and women who think that The Constitution is either a joke or, worse, a &#8220;living document&#8221; that can be altered anyway the elitists in Congress or the Administration want to.  It is going to be good to see those so foolish amongst us learn.  It is a shame, however, that those of us who realize that the U.S. Congress and the Administration is the problem and the enemy of freedom and individual prosperity are going to drag us down with them, until enough of us read, study and learn the true meaning of liberty and the facts of world history of these matters.</p>
<p>When we march on Washington, I say Salazar is the first to visit the closest Liberty Tree!  For energy is the life blood of freedom!</p>
<p>The Liberty Tree Lantern would suggest that all who understand what the Administration and the U.S. Congress are trying to do to us by increasing the price of oil and gas, by dramatically diminishing future supplies from exploration,  should write and call their representatives and redouble our efforts to allow for drilling and exploration of our vast domestic oil and gas resources.  <strong><em><span style="color: #800000">Don&#8217;t wait until it is too late</span></em></strong>, like when gasoline is over $4.00 per gallon again.  <strong><span style="color: #800000">Can you afford it?</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/03/10/price-of-gasoline-diesel-and-energy-going-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salazar orders BLM to reject bids on 77 Utah leases</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/02/05/salazar-orders-blm-to-reject-bids-on-77-utah-leases/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/02/05/salazar-orders-blm-to-reject-bids-on-77-utah-leases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The 77 parcels that the Bush administration offered on the doorsteps of some of our national icons raised several troubling questions. I have directed the BLM not to accept the bids. We will take time to review the processes behind their inclusion in the lease sale," he told reporters in a teleconference.

Salazar indicated that he does not expect his decision to be legally challenged. "The government contract is not formally completed until the BLM accepts the bids, which has not happened in this case," he said. Payments for the winning bids on the 77 parcels will be returned and leasing will proceed on the 39 remaining tracts from the sale, he added.

The decision was the secretary's second action involving a BLM oil and gas lease sale in less than a week. He ordered the DOI agency on Feb. 2 to remove eight tracts from a Feb. 3 lease sale after Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal expressed concerns about them (OGJ Online, Feb. 4, 2009). The offering of 137 remaining parcels went ahead as scheduled, raising nearly $2.4 million from the sale of leasing rights and from rental fees on 112 parcels.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: green"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Folks, Do you realize that stopping these leases from moving forward is going to put upward pressure on the price of gasoline, diesel, heating your home, electricity and products of all kinds?<span>  </span>Do you realize that oil technology has advanced to the point that they can place an oil well as much as 50 miles away from the point they want to harvest oil, which will protect any area we want to protect?<span>  </span>Do you realize that lower crude oil prices help our American economy and give a boost to our individual financial wealth by lowering the costs of most everything and helping America to be competitive and create jobs?</span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: green"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Times New Roman"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: green"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Look what the hell our U.S. Government is doing to us, our economy and our pocket books again.<span>  </span>We have to do something about this!<span>  </span>Write and call your representative before they kill us off financially!<span>  </span>We need this oil to keep prices low!<span>  </span>Lower is better to save us, our jobs, our money and our American Dream! </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="color: green"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">- Capt. Karl</span></span></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude--><strong>Nick Snow</strong><br />
<em>Washington Editor</em></p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude--><strong>WASHINGTON, DC, Feb. 5</strong> &#8212; US Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar directed the Bureau of Land Management on Feb. 4 not to accept $6 million in successful bids on 77 tracts offered in BLM&#8217;s Dec. 18 oil and gas lease sale in Utah.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->&#8220;The 77 parcels that the Bush administration offered on the doorsteps of some of our national icons raised several troubling questions. I have directed the BLM not to accept the bids. We will take time to review the processes behind their inclusion in the lease sale,&#8221; he told reporters in a teleconference.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->Salazar indicated that he does not expect his decision to be legally challenged. &#8220;The government contract is not formally completed until the BLM accepts the bids, which has not happened in this case,&#8221; he said. Payments for the winning bids on the 77 parcels will be returned and leasing will proceed on the 39 remaining tracts from the sale, he added.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->The decision was the secretary&#8217;s second action involving a BLM oil and gas lease sale in less than a week. He ordered the DOI agency on Feb. 2 to remove eight tracts from a Feb. 3 lease sale after Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal expressed concerns about them (OGJ Online, Feb. 4, 2009). The offering of 137 remaining parcels went ahead as scheduled, raising nearly $2.4 million from the sale of leasing rights and from rental fees on 112 parcels.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->Salazar did not rule out some of the 77 Utah tracts ultimately being leased. &#8220;I don&#8217;t necessarily believe that all of them won&#8217;t go into oil and gas development sometime in the future. I do believe that the proximity of Arches National Park, Dinosaur National Monument, and Nine-Mile Canyon raised serious questions about the planning process that was used,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->But he stopped short of saying that the resource management plans which Utah&#8217;s BLM office completed prior to the December lease sale could be overturned. &#8220;We&#8217;ll look at them as we get our feet better planted on the ground,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude--><strong>Additional actions likely</strong><br />
Salazar also suggested that further actions could be forthcoming. &#8220;At this point, we are looking at many of the Bush administration decisions. Some of them are probably going to be good decisions. Others we will disagree with. There were a number of decisions that were made without going through the proper environmental reviews and using sound sciences to develop them. We are reviewing all of those and expect to have additional announcements in the days and weeks ahead,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->Environmental organizations applauded Salazar&#8217;s move. &#8220;Today&#8217;s announcement signals a new era in the way our natural resources are managed,&#8221; said Sierra Club Deputy Director Bruce Hamilton. &#8220;The Obama administration clearly understands that instead of allowing the oil industry to destroy places like Arches National Park, we should be investing in the kind of clean energy solutions that curb global warming and leave our natural treasures intact.&#8221;</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->Stephen Bloch, conservation director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance in Salt Lake City, called the secretary&#8217;s action &#8220;a critical first step in bringing balance back to public lands management in Utah&#8217;s remarkable red-rock country. This decision rescues the stunning landscapes of Desolation Canyon and the White River from the ravages of oil and gas development.&#8221;</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->Oil and gas trade association officials had the opposite reaction. &#8220;The decision runs counter to President Barack Obama&#8217;s stated goal of reducing US reliance on foreign energy sources and is at odds with the judgment of most Americans that the nation should develop more of its own oil and natural gas,&#8221; said American Petroleum Institute Pres. Jack N. Gerard. &#8220;With US domestic oil production declining, we need to develop more and keep more jobs and economic activity in this country,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p><!--endclickprintinclude--><!--startclickprintinclude-->Kathleen Sgamma, government affairs director for the Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States in Denver, said, &#8220;At a time when the Utah legislature has contemplated cutting a day from the school year to address the budget shortfall, the state is losing income from its share of the lease sale, not to mention royalty and other tax revenue from forfeited production. With this decision, our government is denying access to American energy that belongs to all Americans and making it even more difficult to increase energy security and tackle climate change.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2009/02/05/salazar-orders-blm-to-reject-bids-on-77-utah-leases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courting Energy</title>
		<link>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/11/18/courting-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/11/18/courting-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming and Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists / Special Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind turbine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captkarl.blogivists.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America needs more and better sources of energy. That’s not up for discussion. But what a firestorm has erupted over what those sources should be!

Despite public opinion (e.g. with prices down, support for offshore drilling remains high—at 68%), America’s energy solutions continue to be dictated and repressed by Hard Left environmentalist groups—and they are increasingly turning to the courts to enforce their liberal, anti-energy agenda.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span style="color: #003366"><a name="Courting_Energy"></a>Courting Energy</span></h3>
<p>By Isaac MacMillen<img src="http://www.getliberty.org/content_images/Greensagainstnukes.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="272" height="252" align="right" /></p>
<p>America needs more and better sources of energy. That’s not up for discussion. But what a firestorm has erupted over what those sources should be!</p>
<p>Despite public opinion (e.g. with prices down, <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2128&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2128&amp;F=H">support for offshore drilling remains high—at 68%</a>), America’s energy solutions continue to be dictated and repressed by Hard Left environmentalist groups—and they are increasingly turning to the courts to enforce their liberal, anti-energy agenda.</p>
<p>A quick look at available energy sources tells a sad tale:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">• Coal? In Utah, the permit for a coal-burning plant was <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2138&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2138&amp;F=H">blocked by the EPA for CO emission reasons</a>. This <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2126&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2126&amp;F=H">halts the construction of new coal power plants</a>. Using similar environmentalist reasoning, a judge in Georgia <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2142&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2142&amp;F=H">blocked another coal plant </a>earlier this year. Even <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2127&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2127&amp;F=H">clean-coal plants are feeling the pressure</a>, with 8 plants forced to cancel construction in 2007 because of regulation-driven costs or uncertainties.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">• Natural gas? A <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2127&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2127&amp;F=H">natural gas pipeline in Long Island </a>was blocked for environmental reasons. And the fate of a <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2140&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2140&amp;F=H">gas pipeline in Colorado</a> remains uncertain.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">• Drilling? We have the oil. But as <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2133&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2133&amp;F=H">Shell found out last year</a>, courts can step in and prevent exploration. Of course, given the strength of envirolobby supporters in Congress, Shell—and other oil companies—will have to consider the courts the least of their worries. The lifting of the offshore drilling moratorium may be short-lived. <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2137&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2137&amp;F=H">New, advanced methods of extracting oil </a>may be doomed by environmental regulation. And the oceans of oil and gas in the continental United States will continue to be neglected.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">• Nuclear? Regulations have made this—the safest of all power options—economically impractical. Too bad, as it has already <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2129&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2129&amp;F=H">helped France achieve virtually complete energy independence</a>. But apparently France’s near-pristine safety record doesn’t move their hard-core dogmatists. A <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2143&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2143&amp;F=H">quick glance at the safety precautions in place</a> show that most fears of nuclear disaster (accidental or deliberate) are misplaced, as the threat is extremely remote.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">• Wind and solar power? The same liberals who have opposed offshore drilling because of its <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2132&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2132&amp;F=H">supposed aesthetic impact</a>—will they be silent as huge wind and solar farms are built across beautiful plains and rugged desert? (Wait—looks like <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2131&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2131&amp;F=H">they’ve already spoken up</a>—as when Robert Kennedy, Jr., put his own aesthetic wants above his neighbors’ energy needs.)</p>
<p>Environmental radicals have even used the courts for measures as extreme as forcing the U.S. Navy to cease a <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2136&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2136&amp;F=H">vital sonar drill</a> because of potential environmental impact, despite a paucity of proof or a scintilla of evidence. (Fortunately, the <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2123&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2123&amp;F=H">Supreme Court overturned the ruling.</a>)</p>
<p>How well is the Left’s judicial activism working? The environmental legal group <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2139&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2139&amp;F=H">Beverage and Diamond stated</a>:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><em>“By way of these lawsuits, the courts are to some extent shaping climate change policy while state regulatory agencies act more slowly.” </em></p>
<p>Donnell Van Noppen III, the president of <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2130&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2130&amp;F=H">Earthjustice, a group affiliated with the liberal Sierra Club</a>, stated:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><em>“People who support us are the ones who really believe that the use of the courts is crucial. It’s been really proven true in the last few years that the courts are essential because we’ve had a Congress and a White House really wanting to go in quite an anti-environmental direction, and the courts have been the backstop.”</em></p>
<p>The damage the courts are doing to American energy policy is staggering. As a tool of the liberal envirolobby, they have wreaked havoc on America’s energy policies, turning solutions into problems, including <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2125&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2125&amp;F=H">the Supreme Court classifying carbon dioxide a pollutant regulable under the Clean Air Act.</a> But that should come as no surprise to those who have followed their antics throughout the years.</p>
<p>The zeal that radical environmentalists have shown to saving the planet—even at the cost of human life—will ultimately prove fruitless. While they may preserve the planet, what is the point if no one is left to enjoy it? It’s no wonder that they are forced to rely on an oligarchy of black robed judges to proceed with their plans.</p>
<p>If courts continue dictating court-ordered environmental policy, American businesses may eventually find themselves in the same situation as a UK power plant, which was <a title="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2134&amp;F=H" href="http://sl6.sendlabs.com/link.php?M=847799&amp;N=1301&amp;L=2134&amp;F=H">vandalized by environmental activists</a> to the tune of nearly $75,000. But when it brought the crooks to court, the vandalism was ruled “justified” in light of the “greater threat” of global warming.</p>
<p>Businesses need to know, for the long-term, what the rules are going to be. At present, these rules change so often that it is impossible for the businesses to be confident that the investment they make today will not be pillaged tomorrow.</p>
<p>So, it’s true: America needs more and better sources of energy. But right now, even more, it needs to stop the courts from doing the bidding of the radical envirolobby before its wholly contrived firestorm leaves energy independence in ashes.</p>
<p><em>Isaac MacMillen is a contributing editor of ALG News Bureau.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://captkarl.blogivists.com/2008/11/18/courting-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
